According to a newspaper report, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration is worried about “aggravating the anti-gay camp” and wants to “encourage reconciliation between pro and anti-gay camps.”
The report said the government plans to have the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Health and Welfare take “diverse voices” into account when promoting issues like “gender equality” and “diverse families.”
The education ministry’s Gender Equity Education Committee is reportedly also mulling inviting anti-gay groups to take places on the committee.
One could think of some parallels. What if there were a committee responsible for promoting human rights, and, for fear of aggravating the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), military personnel and police who tortured members of the dangwai (黨外, “outside the party”) opposition during the Martial Law era were invited to join the committee and voice the opinions of the party-state apparatus. Would the DPP government think that was a good idea?
If there were a committee concerned with righting the injustices of the White Terror era and former agents who tormented innocent people were given committee seats so that the perpetrators and victims could “get a better understanding of the other side,” would that be right?
Pluralism is founded on mutual respect. If the DPP government accepts religious extremists who have been discriminating against those who are not heterosexually inclined, even taking the lead in oppressing, attacking, ostracizing and cursing gay people, on the committee — imagining that this is diversity — it would not just be wrong, but also demonstrate the hypocrisy and ignorance of President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration.
This might be why the DPP’s governance is at an impasse. When there are progressive issues and values that it should uphold firmly, it instead allows the tail to wag the dog for the sake of possibly winning votes. It is trying to pander to people who do not deserve it.
This is as true of pension reforms for civil servants and teachers as it is of same-sex marriage legislation. Such incompetence and ignorance puts people with minority sexual orientations — and other people who need protection — in a weak position. This is a situation that the government has created intentionally for the sake of votes.
If a church or religion does not accept gay marriage, it can refuse to conduct same-sex weddings. That is religious freedom and cultural diversity, so while it might not be right, it cannot be criticized.
However, one of the principles of a democratic society is the separation of church and state, according to which no citizen should suffer oppression from any organization, religious or otherwise, just because they love somebody of the same sex and long to have an ordinary, loving family and enjoy the recognition and safeguards that the state affords to marital relations.
The state should stand up for minorities and protect them from prosecution rather than dance to the oppressors’ tune while calling it “pluralism.”
The DPP was founded by people who underwent all kinds of oppression during the Martial Law era. If the party cannot uphold humane values, but instead recreates medieval religious persecution, one must suspect that the joy of having full control of the Cabinet and legislature has led the DPP to start neglecting the values that it used to cherish and forget the oppression that its forebears suffered.
For a Taiwanese who has always believed in the DPP’s values, nothing could be more infuriating.
Marco Chu is a project manager at National Cheng Kung University’s Center for Humanities and Social Sciences.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations