The situation in which former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) found himself in his final years as the leader of the Republic of China is, in some ways, similar to the situation that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is currently in.
The similarities include a period of economic growth, a public gradually becoming more informed and cognizant of what is happening in the nation, and the emergence of martyrs willing to sacrifice themselves for freedom and democracy.
Chiang did not ignore these phenomena. He looked into himself and lifted martial law, which is what the public wanted.
There is no martial law in China, but people are having their rights taken away and being subjected to state control. In that, the situation in China is worse than it was in Taiwan under martial law.
Where Xi goes from here will shape China’s destiny.
Taiwan’s trio of martyrs were born with the deaths of three men, which shook the foundations of the martial law system.
They are democracy movement pioneer Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕), who set himself on fire defending his right to publish; journalist and writer Henry Liu (劉宜良) — also known by his pen name Chiang Nan (江南) — allegedly murdered on the orders of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) for his unflattering biography of Chiang; and Carnegie Mellon University associate professor Chen Wen-chen (陳文成), allegedly murdered by members of the Taiwan Garrison during a visit to Taipei over his pro-democracy activities.
The three martyrdoms generated enormous pressure in Taiwan and overseas on Chiang, and members of the nation’s elite, who had received a liberal education in the US, called en masse for him to embark upon the road to democracy, forcing him to lift martial law.
Although his decision was met with dismay by a minority of people with vested interests, it was welcomed by the majority of Taiwanese.
There has been more than one Chinese martyr who died in the fight for democracy and human rights. Former Chinese paramount leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) was aware of the danger of creating martyrs out of the students who blocked the tanks in Tiananmen Square with their bodies, and the images of that tragic event are still very emotive.
However, Xi does not seem to realize that keeping cancer-stricken Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) incarcerated until his death essentially created an internationally renowned martyr for democracy, as well as revealing to the world China’s barbaric system of perpetual martial law.
Liu represents a new image of the martyr, from the empty chair with which he was honored in Oslo when he won the Nobel Peace Prize to his thin, yet determined smile and his indefatigable spirit even in the face of death.
This image tests Xi, himself a victim of the Cultural Revolution, and the thousands of intellectuals who went overseas to receive a Western education after the Tiananmen Massacre.
If Xi does not think it appropriate to deliver his people from their chains, then he is not fit to talk of a “Chinese dream” or to be the leader of a modern nation.
If the Western-educated Chinese intellectuals cannot see the need to reflect on what is happening in their nation and do not challenge the rule of the autocratic Chinese Communist Party, then they are selfish, corrupt, devoid of a conscience and entirely lacking in ideals.
China now has its own democracy martyr. It remains to be seen whether the Chinese will realize this, or whether Xi will realize, as Chiang did, the need to respond to the events and lift the system that is martial law in everything but name.
The world is watching.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under