The Legislative Yuan on July 5 added three projects to the Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program to improve food safety, boost the birth rate and cultivate talent.
For the food safety project, the Food and Drug Administration has planned a budget of more than NT$5 billion (US$164.4 million) — later reduced to about NT$3 billion by the Executive Yuan — to build laboratories and testing facilities, and to purchase inspection vehicles.
However, such an approach is questionable, because food safety needs to be monitored from the source, rather than tested after the production process.
If the nation wants to create an effective system to ensure food safety, it must address every aspect of food production from the farm to the moment it is served.
This would require increased regulations, information and education on food safety, as well as more inspection staff, technologies and facilities among others.
Every aspect is interconnected and requires full cooperation between local governments, the Council of Agriculture, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Environmental Protection Administration and the courts.
However, the project focuses solely on enhancing food inspection hardware, which is not very forward-looking.
Regarding the source of agricultural products, conventional farming — which uses chemical fertilizers and herbicides — is the most common practice in the nation. Although organic, toxin-free agricultural products are healthier, they are rare and too expensive for most people.
The government should prioritize the promotion of affordable and healthier agricultural products by helping develop farming technologies and plant genetics.
If organic and toxin-free agricultural products could become part of the nation’s mainstream diet, it would help reduce the cost of medical treatment and care services, and allow older people to live healthier, more dignified lives.
As for the sale of food products, despite the government’s efforts to promote four food certification labels and a traceability system using QR codes, the pesticide levels in many such products have been found to exceed legal limits, and there have been some cases of counterfeited certification labels.
As a result, consumers have little faith in the food inspection system.
The government should utilize technologies such as big data, blockchain and open-access information, as well as develop efficient testing technologies to build a system that covers all the important aspects of food safety.
With increased trade liberalization, the government needs to be prepared for more imported food, which is more difficult to trace and will increase the types of food available in the market.
Specifically, the government will need to enhance inspections for foreign goods before they are imported, constantly update its food database and require importers to be responsible for ensuring food safety and obtaining certification.
This should be one of the priorities of the government’s food safety project.
Policies should be designed to promote public interest first and foremost. Economic or social policies that are designed to promote certain ideologies or help a party win the next election never really work.
The development program was initially met with considerable criticism from the public, which led to several minor adjustments in the final plan.
Hopefully, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration will do it right this time, as few things are more important for the public than food safety.
Lee Wu-chung is an academic specializing in agricultural economics.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations