Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was elected with more than 830,000 votes in November 2014 after running as an independent candidate.
Four months later, he proposed the “2015 new viewpoint” during an interview with Chinese media, saying that Taiwanese must respect signed agreements and the history of interactions between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, while seeking mutual recognition, understanding, respect and cooperation based on the existing political foundation for a “better shared future.”
As Ko promised to respect signed cross-strait agreements, he immediately won Chinese authorities’ praise. As a result, the Taipei-Shanghai City Forum took place on Aug. 17 that year.
Despite Ko’s compromise, the annual forum has not brought China’s goodwill over the past two years, as Beijing has been acting worse by oppressing Taiwan’s international space at the World Health Assembly and as evidenced by Panama switching its diplomatic recognition from Taipei.
At a critical moment such as this, the forum was held as planned on July 1. Ko not only participated pleasantly at the event, but he also proposed ideas such as the two sides being “one close family” and “a joint community with a shared destiny.”
Since his remarks were similar to political slogans used by Beijing to deceive Taiwanese, they were instantly praised by pan-blue camp media, which reported that Ko was able to see the “public’s wishes” on the one hand while criticizing the government on the other hand.
Why did Ko — who proclaims himself to be “deep-green” — insist on participating in the forum and why does he believe that it was the wish of the people he represents.
The reason is that Ko and many “old, blue men” have been obsessed with so-called “merchant economics” over the past decade or so, as they believe that cross-strait exchanges are beneficial to both parties, from a businessperson’s perspective.
The damage caused by the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) to Taiwan’s economy during former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) terms is self-evident: Economic growth turned negative during the period and wages regressed to a level last seen 16 years ago.
For the sake of the forum, Ko has promised to respect signed agreements, including the controversial cross-strait service in trade agreement, while denying the legitimacy of the Sunflower movement. This clearly shows his obsession with merchant economics.
The damage done to the nation’s economy by merchant economics is too widespread to quantify.
From the Asia-Pacific Regional Operations Center in the 1990s and the Economic Development Advisory Conference’s conclusion of “active opening” in 2001 to popular theories, such as ordering in Taiwan and manufacturing in China; a “smile curve”; and the three B’s — bridge, brand, brain — in the 2000s were all based on the thinking of businesspeople.
Lost in the huge Chinese market, they departed from the true meaning of national economy, delayed the nation’s economic transformation and widened the income gap.
Despite its slogan of being “mutually beneficial and reciprocal,” the forum is mixed with the strong political factors of Beijing’s “united front” work. The forum does not benefit Taipei completely and has more negative effects than positive.
For instance, Taipei might have downgraded itself to an outpost for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, while losing its dignity, the public’s loyalty to the nation and the money and talent drawn to Shanghai.
As Ko promotes academic and sports exchanges with China, would it not be more effective for him to use that budget to make exchanges with friendly neighboring nations?
Is it necessary to resolve the cross-strait deadlock today? Since the ball is in China’s court, Taiwanese should not panic or be at a loss as to what to do.
The central government is not so anxious and has therefore obtained “cold peace” prosperity over the past year or so. In that case, why is the Taipei City Government so anxious about it?
Instead of debating the benefits and drawbacks of the “2015 new viewpoint” or “a joint community with a shared destiny,” Ko should take the initiative to abolish the forum, which does not benefit the city and only hurts Taiwan’s economy and the public’s feelings. Perhaps this is closer to what Taiwanese really want.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s