DPP must abolish agencies
Following last week’s decision by the Control Yuan to impeach former Academia Sinica president Wong Chi-huey (翁啟惠), 70 academics have published an open letter criticizing the body for passing an extrajudicial pronouncement of guilt before a trial has taken place.
Putting aside the questionable legal basis for the impeachment and the questionable way in which Control Yuan members arrived at their judgement, it is clear that the continued existence of the body will only create more such problems in the future.
It should have been abolished years ago and the sooner it is consigned to the dustbin of history, the better.
During the administration of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), former Control Yuan president Wang Chien-shien mocked the body for being nothing more than a “retirement home” and “chicken ribs” (Chinese slang for something of little or no value).
Meanwhile, pan-blue camp legislators, citing a report published by a political think tank, criticized the Control Yuan and Examination Yuan for stifling progress and impeding the nation’s political development — and added that there was no reason for either body’s continued existence.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), then in opposition, went even further, issuing strident appeals for the immediate abolition of both bodies.
However, following the DPP’s return to government last year, it significantly toned down its rhetoric. The government has been dragging its feet on the issue, saying that the bodies could still perform a useful function.
It is no secret that the executive, judicial and legislative functions performed by the Control Yuan and Examination Yuan are at best of questionable value, and at worst totally superfluous. Legislators have a mandate to independently exercise the authority bestowed upon them by the public as they see fit, while members of the two bodies simply disrupt the legislative process and throw a spanner in the works of democratic government. It is for this reason that there is now a consensus among the public to abolish both the bodies.
Since a majority of the public approves of abolishing the two bodies, the time is ripe to amend the Constitution. This begs the question: what is the DPP waiting for?
If the party says one thing in opposition and then does another when in government — and then shows signs that it is beginning to believe its own lies — how can it hope to maintain the support of the public?
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with