Walking toward the arrivals hall at Washington Dulles International Airport in Virginia on a typically busy evening, the Sadiq family might easily have been lost in the crowd.
However, the emotion that overcame the three women, a mother and her two adult daughters, was apparent as they saw the small crowd assembled to greet them, holding signs that read: “Welcome to America.”
Shaz Sadiq, 42, wept as she embraced an old friend. Her sister, Rahila, 40, doubled over at the symbolic finish line of a long, contentious journey. The pair’s 72-year-old mother, Doris, was wide-eyed as she scanned the terminal from her wheelchair, before offering a kiss to the advocates who waited.
Illustration: Mountain People
Just one week ago, the Sadiq family thought their dreams of building a new life in the US had been dashed, perhaps for good.
A June 26 ruling by the US Supreme Court put into effect elements of US President Donald Trump’s travel ban on refugees and immigrants from six Muslim-majority countries.
Although Pakistan, the Sadiq family’s homeland, was not on the list of banned countries, the controversial policy placed a 120-day hold on all refugee admissions.
“It’s beyond [me] to express or explain what we went through,” said Shaz, who said she was having “mixed feelings” in the moment.
Asked about the affect of not knowing whether the US would still open its doors to her family, she said: “My mother suffered major depression. My younger sister, she started to have panic attacks. It’s difficult for others to understand even that pain — when you are already a stateless person, going through so many insecurities, and then you are uncertain about your future and do not have any control of your own life.”
Hours after the Sadiqs touched down in Virginia, a federal judge in Hawaii rejected a motion seeking to limit the scope of Trump’s executive order. The ruling pointed to a long road ahead for immigration and human rights advocates. The months-long and tumultuous legal battle over Trump’s travel ban has already thrust many families like the Sadiqs into a state of limbo.
For the Sadiqs, the journey began well before Trump was elected.
The Sadiqs are Christian and fled their homeland after their father was killed in a church shooting and death threats became routine. In 2013, the Sadiq sisters moved to Bangkok. They spent four years navigating the grueling process of obtaining refugee status and applying for permanent resettlement in the US, which has one of the most stringent vetting systems in the world.
The US Supreme Court is to take up the travel ban again in the fall. In the meantime, it has instructed that visa applicants from the six Muslim-majority countries and all refugees must prove a “bona fide relationship” with a person or entity in the US “before being approved for travel.”
A restrictive definition of “close family” means only those with a specific set of familial relations are to be allowed into the US.
Those seeking to prove a relationship with an entity must show a “formal, documented” relationship with an institution such as an employer or an educational institute.
Proving a “bona fide relationship” is likely to be particularly tough for refugees, who often have no ties to a country before arriving.
The US Department of State has said a “formal assurance” from a resettlement agency, such as the International Rescue Committee (IRC), would not count alone.
This wording has left some resettlement groups unsure of where they stand.
Because the Sadiqs were processed prior to the US Supreme Court’s ruling, they were not required to prove a “bona fide relationship” in the US. Had they been required to do so, their application might have been rejected.
The family’s only contact in the US was Kristin Kim Bart, senior director of gender equality at the IRC and an old friend for whom Shaz Sadiq had worked as an interpreter, years ago in Pakistan.
It is unlikely that friendship would past muster as a “bona fide relationship,” said Ruben Chandrasekar, executive director of the IRC’s Maryland office, which oversees the resettlement of about 1,300 to 1,400 refugees a year.
“These are people that are fleeing unspeakable things,” Bart said. “We have a responsibility as a country to help others and shelter others who aren’t fortunate to live in peaceful times.”
“They’re regular people, they want a regular life,” she added.
The IRC has vehemently opposed Trump’s travel ban since its first iteration was unveiled, in late January.
“From the very beginning, we have believed that the travel ban makes for bad humanitarian policy and bad foreign policy,” Chandrasekar said. “We’re talking about people who are fleeing terror, fleeing violence and fleeing civil war.”
The term “bona fide relationship” was highly contested and made the already complex work of refugee resettlement groups more difficult, he said.
“The Supreme Court’s guidance, we feel, has been interpreted very narrowly by the administration,” Chandrasekar said, adding that the Trump administration had excluded grandparents from counting as a “bona fide relationship.”
“We hope that the administration will continue to expand its definition of what it means,” he said.
A senior Trump administration spokesman was last week unable to provide examples of what might count as a “bona fide relationship” with a US entity.
A state department spokesman said claims would be assessed on a “case by case basis” and did not offer examples.
The spokesman confirmed that refugees scheduled to travel to the US “on or around” July 12 would still be allowed to enter the US without proving a “bona fide relationship.”
The state department that after tomorrow, the US would have exceeded the 50,000 yearly refugee resettlement limit imposed by Trump’s travel ban.
After this date, any refugee entering the US would have to prove their ties to the US, the spokesman said.
Standing inside the terminal at Dulles, less than 48km from the White House, Shaz Sadiq called for a more humane approach to refugees.
The administration has in the past expressed a preference for members of religious minorities, such as her family.
Refugees should not be vilified, whatever their background, Shaz Sadiq said.
“Your life becomes like hell,” she said. “You are not a criminal, you are a victim. Someone should be there to take care of you.”
It would take a while for the Sadiq family to put their ordeal behind them, she said, but for now she was looking forward to stepping outside without the constant fear of being arrested by immigration authorities.
“We suffered a lot,” she said, pausing for a moment before allowing herself a laugh. “No more traumas.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry