In newsrooms and on assignment around the world, journalists who work for al-Jazeera are trying to set aside worries that each story they cover could be their last.
Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Bahrain have demanded that Qatar close the TV station as one of their main conditions for lifting a month-long blockade of the tiny, gas-rich kingdom, making journalists pawns in a bitter regional fight.
Just hours before Wednesday’s deadline for Qatar to formally respond to the demands last week, al-Jazeera English senior correspondent Jamal Elshayyal said most journalists at the station were well prepared for working under the heaviest political pressure.
“Without wanting to sound too dramatic, this isn’t the first time we have come under threat,” Elshayyal said.
Over two decades, the Doha-based channel has transformed the media environment in the Gulf, at some point angering almost every power in a region with very few democracies and no tradition of independent media.
“We are used to being under the cosh, because of the unique nature of al-Jazeera as the first independent media organization in a region filled with propaganda channels,” Elshayyal said.
His channel, award-winning and internationally recognized, is not the main target of the blockade. Its sister channel, al-Jazeera Arabic, which reaches far wider audiences and has more controversial coverage, is widely believed to be the real focus.
It was launched with a swath of staff from BBC Arabic in 1996 after Saudi partners connected to the ruling family forced the closure of the channel after a row about content.
“They took the spirit of the BBC with them to al-Jazeera,” said Ian Richardson, the last managing editor of BBC Arabic, who added he had kept in touch with staff after moving on.
About two-thirds of BBC staff joined al-Jazeera and the dispute is likely to bring back painful memories of the previous turmoil they endured, he said.
“I think they will be very distressed and very uncertain because I am certain those who work in the newsrooms will wonder whether they will pay the price — losing their jobs and seeing something they are immensely proud of destroyed,” Richardson said.
In recent years the Arabic channel has been criticized for both antisemitism and extreme sectarianism, including a program that discussed massacring the Alawite sect of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
However, the Gulf states targeting al-Jazeera are not focused on broadcasting standards and sectarian tensions, but the Qataris’ support for the uprisings of the Arab Spring and Islamist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood.
Regional strongmen and hereditary monarchs see those groups, pushing for regime change, as an existential threat.
“There seems to be rather a smear campaign,” al-Jazeera English managing editor Giles Trendle said. “I would trace it back to 2011 when we had the so-called Arab Spring.”
“There was talk of democracy and getting rid of all these autocratic regimes. I think obviously some of those regimes are still in place or have reappeared in one guise or another and are concerned that there is an organization like al-Jazeera,” he said.
That makes the demand to shutter the station a political attack on the media, the London-based National Union of Journalists president Tim Dawson said.
“Al-Jazeera as an editorial product and an employer is by no means above criticism, but that does not make the call for its closure any less monstrous. Everyone who cares about free speech and a free press should rally to its cause,” he said.
It is also potentially devastating for individual journalists and their families. Some could be left without a home, if they come from countries that have criticized al-Jazeera.
“Were Qatar to comply with Saudi Arabia’s outrageous demand that it shuts al-Jazeera, the station’s staff would obviously be devastated. Those in the UK would lose their jobs, most of those based in Qatar would lose their homes as well,” Dawson said.
Although the channel was set up and is still funded by the Qatari state, al-Jazeera journalists said they had not been given any insight into how negotiations were going, or whether the government would stand firm.
“Tomorrow [Friday] we will see what the foreign minister has come up with. We don’t know what Qatar’s response has been and we don’t know what the response to that response will be. It’s very difficult to predict,” Trendle said.
Journalists at the channel had been heartened by “uplifting and encouraging” support from other media organizations, which have condemned the demand to close the channel.
The Economist described it as “an extraordinary, extraterritorial assault on free speech. It is as if China had ordered Britain to abolish the BBC.”
In the Times, columnist Hugo Rifkind had an even sharper warning: “Grandiose as it might sound, this could be the greatest assault on press freedom in the past 50 years.”
The journalists were more frustrated by what Elshayyal described as only half-hearted support from Western governments.
However, for now he is focused mostly on a professional frustration.
Saudi and Emirates officials have refused countless requests to come on air and explain why they want the station gone; he has resorted to tweeting interview requests.
“That’s how committed we are to neutrality, we are keen to give them a platform to explain why they don’t want us to exist,” Elshayyal said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs