At a reception, we encountered a “mindfulness guru.”
Yes, that is actually the job title on his business card — one bearing the logo of a huge multinational software company. His job is to teach the company’s stressed-out employees the “art of mindfulness,” which has been described as “awareness that arises through paying attention, on purpose, in the present moment, non-judgmentally” and “knowing what is on your mind.”
Mindfulness seems to be everywhere nowadays. Companies such as Apple Inc, Sony Corp, IKEA, and Google have joined the trend, and now include mindfulness or meditation in their employee benefit packages, in the hope of cultivating a happier, healthier, more productive workforce.
Moreover, some hospitals offer mindfulness meditation sessions to patients and employees, and some elementary schools assign rowdy children mindful “time-outs.”
Already this year, the New York Times’ “Well” section has more than a dozen articles about mindfulness. A Google search for the word yields about 67 million hits.
Extravagant claims for mindfulness have been made. Its advocates assert that it can improve a number of conditions — including anxiety, depression, stress and even drug addiction — while boosting productivity, but can mindfulness deliver on its many promises?
To be sure, there is a scientific basis for mindfulness, but the science does not vindicate any particular lifestyle or thought pattern, because the basis is breathing.
Located deep within the brainstem is a tiny cluster of neurons, the pre-Boetzinger complex, that links respiration to feelings of relaxation, attention, excitement and anxiety. Called the “pacemaker for breathing,” it communicates the activity in the brain’s respiratory control center to the structure responsible for generating arousal throughout the brain. Thanks to this region of the brain, slow, smooth, rhythmic breathing can induce a state of calm.
However, today’s prevailing version of mindfulness extends beyond breathing to guide the way practitioners think. Over the past 30 years, many studies, including meta-analyses, have claimed to show that when this type of mindfulness is practiced regularly, people experience positive changes in their sense of well-being, their relationships, their ability to concentrate, their experience of physical and emotional pain, and their capacity to enjoy life.
Yet many, perhaps even most, of these studies seem to be observational (that is, uncontrolled) or poorly controlled, and they are susceptible to publication bias — the tendency to publish only studies that support the hypothesis, also known as the “file drawer effect.”
We wonder how, in a randomized controlled study, mindfulness would compare to other stress-reducing interventions, such as adopting a pet, hiking regularly or practicing yoga, which incorporates mindful breathing.
In fact, mindfulness might carry a risk, compared with these other interventions.
In some cases, mindfulness has taken on a kind of cult-like status, and some practitioners have reported feelings of depersonalization and detachment, and even loss of identity. Others have had more extreme reactions, including psychosis, delusions, confusion, mania or depression. Maybe such outcomes should not be surprising, given that the practice of mindfulness encourages exploration of experiences — whether negative, neutral, or positive — with a nonjudgmental attitude.
The adoption of mindfulness by so many high-tech companies might be particularly problematic, because it could effectively paper over the real problem — chronically overworked, stressed-out employees.
At a time when many companies are implementing cost-cutting measures and pushing employees to boost their productivity, mindfulness and meditation programs are a more management-friendly solution than raising wages or hiring more employees, but there is more to it than that.
Some corporate leaders in Silicon Valley view mindfulness as a way to improve employees’ “emotional intelligence” (EI), which helps people to understand others’ motivations, thereby boosting competitiveness.
As Tan Chade-meng — founder of the Search Inside Yourself Leadership Institute, which provides mindfulness and meditation courses to Google — told Wired magazine: “Everybody knows this EI thing is good for their career and every company knows that if their people have EI, they’re gonna make a shitload of money.”
Whether or not mindfulness really is the panacea its proponents claim it to be, there is no question about its appeal. While companies like the idea that mindfulness can improve their bottom line, individuals might be eager for a way to escape their quotidian cares (especially now that Downton Abbey has been relegated to reruns).
The past year brought numerous terror attacks, mass shootings, fetal deformities from Zika virus infections and, last but not least, the US presidential election and its rancorous aftermath. If deep breathing and focusing on the here and now can help to alleviate the burden of some of these memories, sign us up.
Mia Zaharna is a psychiatrist specializing in sleep disorders. Henry Miller, a physician and molecular biologist, is a fellow in scientific philosophy and public policy at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry