The rejection of National Chung Cheng University students and their professor from a UN Human Rights Commission International Labor Conference earlier this month because they presented their passports should not surprise anyone who follows the news of petitions by groups and political parties to have Taiwan accepted into the UN, or Taiwan’s participation rejection, even as an informal member or observer, from almost any other inter-governmental institution since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) assumed office last year.
However, that does not make the event any less shameful.
The UN policy to reject Republic of China (ROC) passport holders is not new; several Taiwanese visitors to the UN’s headquarters in New York City and the UN office in Geneva have been denied entry on presentation of their ROC passport to security over the years, with a number of high-profile cases gaining significant media attention in Taiwan.
UN representatives have said that its offices only accept travel documentation from territories it recognizes as countries.
Other forms of ID, such as a driver’s license or social security card, are acceptable for entry.
However, the academic delegation from National Chung Cheng University were not told that in this most recent affront to Taiwan’s dignity.
Professor Liu Huang Li-chuan (劉黃麗娟) and her labor relations students were barred from attending the conference because, they were told, Taiwan is not a country and does not adhere to the “one China” principle.
Never mind that the passports were issued by the ROC government, considering that just over one year ago, when former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was in office, acknowledging the ROC for all intents and purposes meant acknowledging “one China.” This justification is laughable at best and dangerous at worst.
To make matters worse, the delegation was told that to be admitted, they must present their Taiwan Compatriot Travel Documents, the ID card issued by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that permits Taiwanese to travel in China. This makes even less sense than the UN’s reasoning for refusing admission to the group from Taiwan.
The Taiwan Compatriot card is not recognized anywhere else in the world besides China; not even the countries most dedicated to upholding the “one China” principle ask Taiwanese to present this document.
Besides the few countries that do not accept the ROC passport and require an application for an entry permit or travel visa, the Taiwanese passport is one of the most widely accepted in the world, with 137 countries offering Taiwanese visa-exempt travel for a designated time.
Since Taiwan now has only 20 diplomatic allies, that means that the vast majority of those 137 countries are ones that adhere to a “one China” policy that the PRC finds acceptable.
The UN would do well to understand that refusing the participation of Taiwanese academics based on their travel documentation has nothing to do with a consistent policy of recognizing the “one China” principle.
Instead, it is a petty act of fealty to a government so insecure about what it considers its historical territory that it treats even the slightest or smallest courtesy to Taiwan as an existential threat.
Furthermore, this kind of behavior betrays the UN’s status as the highest representative body of the community of nations.
Taiwan might not be a universally recognized nation-state, but no one familiar with Taiwan could deny its distinct national identity. It is a vibrant and healthy democracy and its government, since democratization, has made significant progress in its respect for human rights, including the informal adoption of multiple UN accords.
This incident was not the result of an attempt by government officials to push for a change of guidelines or UN recognition; it was a group of well-intentioned students eager to participate in and learn from an international meeting of labor experts, workers and employers.
The UN commission dedicated to the advancement of the rights of all human beings, regardless of political identity, should reflect on the irony of its actions. It only does itself a disservice by shutting the door on Taiwanese participation in its conferences and events.
Jeremy Olivier is a graduate student in the international master’s program of Asia-Pacific Studies at National Cheng Chi University.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under