In October 2015, three weeks after the Shuen De Ching No. 888 was caught fishing illegally in the Pacific Ocean, the European Commission named Taiwan a “non-cooperating third country” in the fight to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU).
The commission issues “yellow cards” and “red cards” in its investigation process.
Following a yellow card, non-cooperating third nations can be banned (issued a red card) from exporting fisheries products into EU markets if they do not substantially improve their fishing management systems.
Since then, the Fisheries Agency has been working intensively on the issue and put emphasis on reforming three related legal frameworks, namely the Fisheries Act (漁業法), the Act Governing Distant Water Fisheries (遠洋漁業條例) and the Act to Govern Investment in the Operation of Foreign Flag Fishing Vessels (投資經營非我國籍漁船管理條例).
Unfortunately, after a Taiwan-EU bilateral meeting in April and the latest round of delisting discussions earlier this month, Taiwan has not had its yellow card status removed, although the EU recognized the progress and efforts Taipei has made. The situation signals three major issues for the government to reflect on.
First, Taiwan’s legal reforms on combating illegal and unregulated fishing mainly focus on increasing penalties on illegal activities. This is indeed a prompt response to the EU’s warning, but also makes the reform’s outcome dependent on the performance of long-term enforcement measures.
The EU’s carding process provides a timely opportunity for Taiwan to integrate its national fishing and ocean policies into an international context. As well as penalizing vessels and any other stakeholders, the government should connect domestic legal frameworks with international fisheries standards.
Second, it is clear that Taiwan does not have sufficient resources to guarantee effective control and surveillance of all illegal fishing worldwide, since IUU fishing has now become a truly global problem that damages marine ecosystems.
According to regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs), successful global marine governance requires multilateral engagements between various sectors and regions.
The government and the nation’s fishing industry should carefully consider the suggestions and collaborative opportunities offered by those “critical friends,” such as Greenpeace, the WWF, the Environmental Justice Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts.
Last but not least, the European Commission is particularly sensitive to IUU cases linked with human rights violations, especially those linked to human trafficking and the working conditions of sea-based migrant fishers.
Taiwan still needs to improve the related provisions in its new Regulations on the Authorization and Management of Overseas Employment of Foreign Crew Members (境外僱用非我國籍船員許可及管理辦法), adopted in January, and to fully meet the requirements set by the International Labour Organization.
That Taiwan has not been issued either a green or red card means that there are some challenges ahead and the opportunity of still working with the EU and RFMOs to improve measures to tackle IUU fishing.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Taipei Bar Association. Teresa Fajardo is a visiting professor at the University of Cambridge and was a researcher at the EU Action to Fight Environmental Crime project.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under