Luring global knowledge workers is essential for any industrialized nation adopting and adapting to the social media economy of this century.
Taiwan’s transformation from labor-intensive industry into a high-tech powerhouse in the 1990s owed much to its effective integration of cutting-edge research in the US and relatively cheap manufacturing facilities.
Since the 1960s, many Taiwanese have received post-graduate degrees in the US and have become successful knowledge workers and entrepreneurs. At that time, most decent jobs in Taiwan were filled by people with good connections to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime. The lack of employment opportunities prompted Taiwanese scientists, engineers and researchers to seek further training the US.
After graduating from universities and research institutes, these knowledge workers found it rewarding to remain overseas, gaining more advanced knowledge and work experience; expanding professional networks; and improving their socioeconomic status. They fulfilled their dreams and climbed the social ladder to become upper middle-class professionals living in US suburbia.
As historian Madeline Hsu argued in her 2015 book The Good Immigrants: How the Yellow Peril Became the Model Minority, the earlier generation of Taiwanese-Americans could not have achieved such remarkable accomplishments if they had not accessed the advanced research laboratories and communities of first-class scientists. The appeal of scientific innovation and technological advancement has inspired generations of students to move to the US.
The US benefits enormously from the influx of these highly-trained Taiwanese workers, whether as permanent residents or short-term workers. US firms tap into this huge advanced labor pool without paying for its rearing and training, and it has raised productivity and enhanced the US’ technological dominance in the global manufacturing chain.
Despite US President Donald Trump’s “America first” rhetoric, most high-tech companies bypass strict labor restrictions by hiring qualified overseas candidates to work in their research and development centers in Canada, Britain, Singapore and Hong Kong.
In the past, the severe brain drain was perceived by KMT administrations as a waste of investment in human capital. However, the global circulation of technological knowledge and human capital is a two-way street. The Taiwanese-American workforce has provided a rich reservoir of value-added human talent for Taiwan.
Embracing a neoliberal, market-driven economy in the 1980s, the government offered attractive tax-reduction packages and reasonably cheap manufacturing facilities for global companies. Competent, entrepreneurial and mobile Taiwanese-American knowledge workers returned home to shape the development of information technology.
With their rich experience and strong professional ties in the US, they created an invisible transnational highway that facilitated technical knowledge transfer and capital infusion.
Taiwanese universities train more competent students in all professions than the domestic economy can absorb. The government has set out to address this structural problem by relaxing legal restrictions on recruiting qualified investors, entrepreneurs and white-collar professionals from abroad.
It is far more important to ensure that Taiwanese can tap into the knowledge assets and business networks of foreign professionals. Only by doing so would Taiwan witness another wave of global knowledge transfer, capital infusion and infrastructure upgrades.
Joseph Tse-hei Lee is professor of history at Pace University in New York.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry