Driverless cars appear unstoppable — except, of course, you can simply walk in front of one and force it to brake. Could this conundrum eventually mean a return to a dystopian world of segregated urban highways?
Picture yourself cycling down a city street in the year 2035. You are late for a meeting, but the road you must cross ahead has recently been designated an “autonomous vehicle-only” route, where platoons of driverless cars whizz past, mere centimeters apart.
You cannot ride across it, as cyclists and pedestrians have been banned for fear they would slow the driverless traffic. You must find a way around. The clock is ticking. Do you attempt to climb the barrier and make a dash through the traffic?
Illustration: Louise Ting
As you wait, you see a group of kids on a side street which is open to all vehicles. They are darting between driverless pods and forcing them to a stop. This is a popular game.
Rewind to today. A report last month estimated that by 2035, up to 25 percent of new vehicles sold could be fully autonomous.
Humans can be terrible drivers, and many proponents believe autonomous vehicles (AVs) could reduce the annual global road death toll of about 1.34 million.
However, cities have some urgent questions to answer and failure to address. The issues raised could see us sleepwalking back into the problems of the 1960s and 70s, when cities became thoroughfares for traffic first and places for people second.
CYCLISTS
Driverless cars navigate and detect other road users using a combination of cameras, detailed maps, radar and, in the case of Google cars, lidar (light detection and ranging), a laser-sensing system adapted from oceanographic surveying.
Google, in a company now spun off as Waymo, has been testing driverless cars — with drivers — on public streets in the US since 2009, clocking 4 million kilometers and honing the technology following interactions with other road users.
A driverless car will, in theory, stop if it detects an object in its path — yet cyclists, being small and agile, represent a unique challenge. AVs struggle with changes in speed and the huge variety of cycle shapes and sizes. They even struggle to detect which way a bicycle is pointing.
Deep3DBox, a program designed to identify 3D objects from 2D images such as camera footage, is the most successful at doing this; yet it only spots cyclists in 74 percent of cases and correctly predicts the direction they are facing just 59 percent of the time. Poor weather makes detection even less accurate.
Renault-Nissan chairman Carlos Ghosn last year described cyclists as “one of the biggest problems for driverless cars.”
They confuse the vehicles, because at times they behave like pedestrians, at other times like cyclists, and “they don’t respect any rules usually,” he said.
Google has acknowledged that “it’s hard for others to anticipate their movements.”
This came after one cyclist bamboozled a self-driving Lexus by performing a prolonged track stand at a junction.
Google has since taught its cars to recognize cyclists’ hand signals, and different sizes and shapes of bike, and allows them more space on the road.
However, the issue of detecting and reacting to unpredictable behavior is far from solved, as the reporters recently witnessed during a ride in a driverless Nissan Leaf.
In a separate incident earlier this year a driverless Leaf was caught on camera overtaking a cyclist at very close proximity, even though the vehicle’s monitors indicated it had detected the rider.
‘UNWORKABLE’
What action should a driverless car be programmed to take when it sees a cyclist or a pedestrian in its path? And what happens if people crossing roads learn they can simply walk in front of AVs, which will be forced to brake?
Robin Hickman, a reader in transport and city planning at University College London’s Bartlett School of Planning, believes this makes driverless cars “unworkable” on busy urban streets.
“In terms of the algorithm for dealing with obstacles that move in unpredictable ways, like cyclists or pedestrians, I would say that’s unsolvable,” Hickman said. “If a pedestrian knows it’s an automated vehicle, they will just take the priority. It would take you hours to drive down a street in any urban area.”
“In the context of India or China, where there are different types of vehicles, more pedestrians, more cyclists, I would say it’s even more difficult for the AV to mix with all these unpredictable users,” Hickman added.
The options for solving these kinds of problems are not always attractive. One possibility is an integrated network of environmental sensors, making the street an extension of the internet of things. This would reduce the likelihood, for example, that a child running out from behind a parked car could surprise an autonomous vehicle. Yet what about privacy?
Then there is the idea of the electronic detection of road users via some form of RFID beacon system, which could even be built into future e-bikes.
However, “what about the 30, 40, 50 percent of pedestrians, cyclists who aren’t connected? It doesn’t exactly make you feel very safe,” European Cyclists’ Federation road safety and technical policy officer Ceri Woolsgrove said.
How about prosecuting pedestrians or cyclists who get in the way of driverless cars?
“It’s very Big Brother-like, there’s a question of safety versus freedom. How much risk to endanger yourself are we going to let you take?” said David Levinson, a professor at the School of Civil Engineering at the University of Sydney who is broadly supportive of AVs.
Thinking back to the kids stopping driverless cars on our imaginary future street, Levinson sees a future where blocking a driverless car could even be criminalized.
“The car has a camera and the picture will be sent to the police department, and the police department will come and arrest you for annoying an autonomous vehicle,” he said.
SIXTIES
Given these challenges, experts including Hickman and Levinson believe segregation and AV-only roads are inevitable.
However, would that not risk a return to the urban dystopia of the 1960s and ‘70s, when planners crisscrossed cities with elevated highways and erected barriers around roads with the aim of improving safety?
The unintended consequences were fast, aggressive driving, and the splitting in two of countless communities.
“I think there will be some roads that will be transformed to higher speed roads,” Levinson said. “I’d be skeptical of someone who says we will not do any of that, but if you can move traffic away from the lower speed streets that pedestrians and cyclists want to use, that’s an improvement.”
Hickman said “the case is overwhelming against AVs,” but said he feared the powerful automotive industry lobby meant so much private and government money is already at stake that the rise of driverless cars would be hard to stop.
The UK Department for Business, Innovation and Skills is delivering a feasibility and R&D program worth more than £200 (US$256 million) via Innovate UK. This includes the GATEway program in Greenwich, which recently turned a section of bike path along the Thames into an AV shuttle lane.
The European Commission has said it is “fully committed to a fast deployment of self-driving technologies,” citing the economic and safety benefits. A recent commission document on Smart Cities mentioned cycling only once, and that was in reference to helmets.
In the US, legislation to allow the testing of driverless cars has been introduced in 35 of 50 states, and adopted in six. Google, Lyft, Uber, Ford and Volvo recently formed the Self Driving Coalition for Safer Streets to lobbying for more favorable federal standards.
“We shouldn’t be designing our future transport strategies based on selling vehicles, we should have different objectives,” Hickman said. “It should be more about the livability of urban life and the benefits of active lifestyles which include walking and cycling. I think there should be a full stop after that.”
There is “potential for good and potential for evil,” Woolsgrove said. “In terms of the car itself, Vision Zero could be genuinely within reach with some of these technologies. You can program a car to obey all of the traffic rules perfectly and to be extra vigilant of cyclists and walkers. You can literally control where the car goes.”
LIMITS
Although driverless cars may be many years from our streets, some of the technology is here already. Lane departure prevention, forward emergency brakes and automatic parking are fitted in today’s cars.
Progress is slow now, but it will reach a tipping point, after which adoption will rapidly accelerate. There is a real concern that while cities are thinking about the implications of autonomous vehicles, the ground is shifting under their feet.
The level of mapping data required for AV navigation, with accuracy down to the millimeter, means a vehicle can only currently download the information for a single city. This makes an urban, lift-sharing scenario more likely.
However, human-controlled Uber and Lyft cars have already added “tremendous” numbers of vehicles to city streets, former New York transportation commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan said.
Sadik-Khan, who is chair of the US’ National Association of City Transportation Officials, said mayors around the world should be asking themselves: “What is the city that you want to be?”
“There’s a lot of interest and people tend to get distracted by this shiny new toy,” she said. “Let’s make sure that is the focus — creating the city that we want to have — and not looking at the technology as the be all and end all.”
“There are some exciting possibilities with autonomous vehicles, but I think we need to remember what makes a great city, and that’s really about the people, not the cars,” she added.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry