On Monday, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) reported a development in an ongoing medical malpractice case brought by retired High Court justice Chen Yi-nan (陳貽男) against National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) doctors who treated his late wife for a brain injury a decade ago.
Supreme Court judges overturned a not-guilty verdict handed down by the High Court using the perverse logic of “guilty until proven innocent.”
At a time when the public is waiting for President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration to enact judicial reforms, Supreme Court judges surprisingly ruled that the burden of proof in the case lies with the defendants, who must prove that malpractice did not occur.
All civilized nations employ the legal concept of “innocent until proven guilty” in criminal law cases. Only in Taiwan does information asymmetry between the plaintiff and the defendant in medical disputes mean that medical workers are legally required to prove their innocence because of a reverse onus clause, also known as inverse burden of proof, in criminal medical malpractice cases.
In Taiwan, information asymmetry between plaintiffs and defendants in criminal cases is standard practice and there are few exceptions. However, is it unconstitutional that the reverse onus clause only applies in cases of medical malpractice?
In the US, the plaintiff must engage a medical professional to provide evidence that a defendant made a mistake before a judge will agree to hear a medical malpractice case.
Chen’s wife, Wang Yuan-chiu (王苑楸), slipped and fell while exercising at a gym and was taken to the NTUH emergency room. Despite an operation, Wang later died. The analysis that follows is based upon reporting of the case by the Liberty Times.
First, it is important to establish if Wang simply fell while at the gym or if she fainted following a heart attack. If it was the former, then primary treatment would have been carried out by surgeons. However, if the latter was true, the case would have been handed over to physicians, with assistance from surgeons if required. How did the emergency room examining medical staff diagnose Wang on her arrival at the hospital?
If Wang’s brain stem was damaged when the head injury occurred, she would likely have died before reaching the hospital. However, if she sustained a brain hemorrhage, there would be three other possibilities.
First, in the case of an epidural hematoma — bleeding from arteries between the outer membrane of the central nervous system (dura mater) and the skull — Wang’s condition would have quickly become apparent to medical staff who would have taken immediate steps to treat it, although the mortality rate in such cases is high.
The second possibility is that the head injuries sustained by Wang caused a subdural hematoma — when bleeding occurs in veins beneath the dura mater.
The third possibility is that Wang sustained a cerebral arteriovenous malformation — when a small amount of bleeding occurs at a slow rate. It often takes up to six hours for symptoms to become apparent, and can even take several days. For this reason, when a patient with head injuries arrives at an emergency room, medical staff must examine a patient’s medical history and look for evidence of cranial nerve disease.
During the examination, medical staff must also assess the patient’s level of consciousness, test for pupillary light and nervous system response.
If the patient’s condition deteriorates, medical staff must assess whether to perform a computerized tomography (CT) scan. However, if there is no change in a patient’s condition, staffing levels permitting, the patient should be checked on an hourly basis and records taken. If, after six to eight hours of observation, the patient’s condition is good, he or she is likely to be discharged.
However, it is recommended that patients are given written patient education materials and that medical staff explain to patients and their relatives that if headaches, vomiting, loss of consciousness or an abnormal feeling in the hands or feet occur, medical attention should be sought immediately.
Finally, it is important to ascertain whether Wang died from a traumatic cerebral hemorrhage or a cardiovascular complication resulting from a brain injury.
If the medical team treating Wang really was negligent, consideration should be given to the treatment systems in place at NTUH, flaws with the National Health Insurance system, whether the emergency room staff at NTUH were overloaded with work, or whether there were deficiencies in the design of the hospital’s triage patient diagnosis systems.
Finally, it must be determined if their staff were negligent by choosing to treat the patient with a single medical discipline and if there were any deficiencies in the training given to emergency room staff.
Hsieh Yen-yau is a retired teaching physician at National Taiwan University Hospital.
Translated by Edward Jones
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry