Wednesday last week was a great day for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights in Taiwan.
The Council of Grand Justices ruled that the Civil Code violates constitutional guarantees of freedom of marriage and equality.
The council required the legislature to amend the Civil Code or establish laws addressing gay couples’ rights within two years.
Amid the celebrations, a reality check is needed. The sad fact is that Taiwanese politicians have failed on the matter. Consequently, same-sex marriage is unlikely to be introduced before the legislative session ends on Wednesday. No further progress can be made before the new session starts in September.
Some politicians were on the road to approving same-sex marriage in the autumn of last year and it was hoped that new legislation would be in force by this year summer.
Even the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) allowed its politicians to vote freely on the matter. Equal marriage rights could have been passed in the current legislative session, but unfortunately momentum stalled in the autumn, due to pressure from some religious groups and moral issues in the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Also, once the Taipei City Government and gay rights advocate Chi Chia-wei (祁家威) had filed suit, it became convenient to wait for a court ruling.
Moreover, politicians in the DPP had begun to worry about a legislative amendment’s possible impact on next year’s local elections.
The DPP is split on the same-sex marriage issue, despite President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) campaign promises.
The ruling is convenient for politicians in both the DPP and KMT. Now they can avoid taking a moral stance in favor of the issue.
Handily, they can now use the ruling to abdicate their responsibility to face down opposition from conservative religious and moral groups.
In contrast to old political parties, the New Power Party (NPP) has been consistent on gay rights before and after last year’s elections. The NPP fully supports marriage equality.
The DPP has to move fast to avoid losing more credibility on the matter. It cannot let this drag on, as young people, civil society and the NPP will pressure the DPP.
According to some sources, an amendment of the Civil Code would be the best option, because the constitutionality of a new and separate law could be questioned.
Moreover, an amendment to the Civil Code has already been studied in great detail.
Wednesday last week would have been a day for even greater celebration if both the court and the Legislative Yuan had opened the doors for marriage equality. This way, all of society could have celebrated, instead of letting courts decide such issues.
That is a failure that should be noted amid the celebrations for gay rights in Taiwan.
May 24 was truly a historic day for many Taiwanese and foreigners alike. Finally, I can fill in my landing card and tick the box that says: “visiting family.”
Michael Danielsen is chairman of Taiwan Corner, a Danish non-governmental organization.
An outrageous dismissal of the exemplary Taiwanese fight against COVID-19 has been perpetrated by the EU. There is no excuse. I presume that everyone who reads the Taipei Times knows that the EU has excluded Taiwan from its so-called “safe list,” which permits citizens unhindered travel to and from the countries of the EU. As the EU does not feel that it needs to explain the character of this exclusive list, perhaps we should examine it ourselves in some detail. There are 14 nations on the list that have been chosen as safe countries of origin and safe countries of destination for
Filmmakers in Taiwan used to struggle when it came to telling a story that could resonate internationally. Things started to change when the 2017 drama series The Teenage Psychic (通靈少女), a collaboration between HBO Asia and Taiwanese Public Television Service (PTS), became a huge hit not just locally, but also internationally. The coming-of-age story was adapted from the 2013 PTS-produced short film The Busy Young Psychic (神算). Entirely filmed in Taiwan, the Mandarin-language series even made it on HBO’s streaming platforms in the US. It is proof that a well-told Taiwanese story can absolutely win the hearts and minds of hard-to-please
Drugged with sedatives, handcuffed and wearing a bright orange prison tunic, British fraud investigator and former journalist Peter Humphrey was escorted by warders into an interrogation room filled with reporters, locked inside a steel cage and fastened to a metal “tiger chair.” Humphrey recalls: “I was completely surrounded by officers, dazed, manacled and with cameras pointing at me through the bars. I was fighting for my life like a caged animal. It was horrifying.” Footage from the interrogation was later artfully edited to give the appearance of a confession and broadcast on Chinese state media. While this might sound like an
The US House of Representatives on July 1 passed by unanimous consent a bipartisan bill that would penalize Chinese officials who implement Beijing’s new national security legislation in Hong Kong, as well as banks that do business with them. The following day, the US Senate unanimously passed the bill, which was later sent to the White House, where it awaits US President Donald Trump’s signature. The bill does not spell out what the sanctions would look like and Trump has yet to sign it into law, but Reuters on Thursday last week reported that five major Chinese state lenders are considering