There are two pictures Thai air pollution expert Supat Wangwongwatana likes to show whenever he talks about Bangkok’s transition — in a little more than a decade — from a city blanketed in smog to one boasting clear blue skies.
The first, taken in the mid-1990s, shows the skyline of downtown Bangkok. Most buildings are in silhouette, shrouded in a thick layer of haze. The Baiyoke Tower, the city’s tallest building then, was still under construction.
The second, taken a decade later from a similar angle, looks dramatically different. The sky is blue, the clouds are visible and the buildings bathed in sunlight.
“Sulfur in diesel fuel and gasoline back in the early 1990s was 10,000 parts per million [ppm]. Today, it is less than 50ppm,” Supat said, referring to a natural component of crude oil that contributes to air pollution.
“That early technology enabled us to reduce emissions,” he said, citing processes for producing cleaner fuel and catalytic converters that make exhaust pipe fumes less toxic.
The WHO calls air pollution “a public health emergency.”
An estimated 6.5 million deaths, nearly 12 percent of all global deaths, were associated with indoor and outdoor air pollution in 2012, the bulk in the Western Pacific and Southeast Asian regions, WHO data showed.
“If nothing was done at all during the last 20, 25 years, I cannot imagine what Bangkok would be like now. People would probably be sick from air pollution,” Supat said.
The former director general of the Pollution Control Department (PCD) at Thailand’s Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment was one of a number of technocrats who led efforts to rein in Bangkok’s rising air pollution levels in the 1990s.
They eliminated lead in fuel, imposed emissions controls based on European norms and regulated construction sites, despite stiff resistance from powerful oil refineries and the automobile industry.
Taxis now run on cleaner liquefied petroleum gas or compressed natural gas and motorcycles no longer spew black smoke from their tailpipes.
Experts say these efforts have helped Bangkok avoid the situation of other megacities, such as Beijing and New Delhi, where air pollution has reached such hazardous levels that even healthy people can fall ill simply from being outside.
However, they warn that Bangkok risks dangerous air pollution levels again due to residents’ insatiable appetite for vehicles.
Nearly 49,000 people died from air pollution in Thailand in 2013, a joint World Bank and University of Washington report said.
While most locations in central Bangkok are well within safe levels as defined by Thailand’s air quality index, it does not factor in PM2.5, fine particles that pose the greatest risks to human health.
Bangkok’s annual average of those particles is 2.4 times the WHO’s safety threshold, the UN agency said.
“PM2.5 can go into blood vessels and cause chronic health problems,” said Tara Buakamsri, Thailand country director for Greenpeace Southeast Asia.
If you do not include those particles in the air quality index, “you cannot see a comprehensive picture,” she added.
Bangkok, home to about 9 million people, remains relatively smog-free, even though vehicle numbers have been increasing every year, experts said.
In the first four months of this year, the city registered 300,000 new vehicles, including buses and motorcycles, bringing the total to nearly 9.5 million.
Despite having the second-worst traffic congestion in the world after Mexico City, according to a global traffic index compiled by navigation company TomTom, Bangkok topped a 2015 list ranking popular tourist destinations on their air quality, from UK-based firm Airport Parking and Hotels.
It might not stay there for long.
“Since the 1990s, the number of automobiles is increasing, so you have more congestion and more sources of emission. That’s a big challenge,” said Bhichit Rattakul, who founded the Anti-Air Pollution and Environmental Protection Foundation a decade before being elected governor of Bangkok in 1996.
To combat this, the PCD has reached preliminary agreements to impose the Euro 5 standard, which further limits pollutants in fuel, by 2023 for oil refineries and by 2024 for vehicles in Thailand.
“The important thing is that the Thai government implements these policies with Thai industry,” said Teera Prasongchan, chair of the Thai Automotive Industry Association’s committee on technical issues and deputy general manager of Toyota Motor Thailand.
“That means we have to sit down and talk, and compromise with each other,” he added.
Thailand has been using the Euro 4 standard since 2012, while the latest standard is Euro 6.
The upgrade in six to seven years might seem a long way off, but Supat, who has retired after working on air pollution issues for almost three decades, but still advises the PCD, said it pays to be patient.
The important thing is to “have a fixed and endorsed timeline,” he said.
Bangkok is an example of what other Southeast Asian cities can do to improve air quality, said Glynda Bathan-Baterina, deputy executive director of the Manila-based non-governmental organization Clean Air Asia.
Still, these “tailpipe solutions” only tackle emissions on a per unit, per vehicle basis, she added.
“The real solution is looking at a mass transport system that can bring massive numbers of people in and out of the city while encouraging them to leave their vehicles at home,” she said.
Bangkok is planning 12 more rapid transit train lines, but they will not be ready until 2029.
Other low-emission solutions, such as electric or hybrid cars, are still a rarity in Thailand. Teera said car manufacturers there are adopting a wait-and-see approach due to concerns over infrastructure and energy supply.
In the meantime, politicians and city leaders need to enforce higher air quality standards to keep residents safe and healthy, Bhichit said.
“The public can avoid the bad places, but ultimately, that’s not the direction the city should be moving in,” he said.
During Bhichit’s time in office, air pollution was so bad he put up signs urging people to avoid Silom Road in downtown Bangkok in the afternoon and cracked down on vehicles whose emissions exceeded standards.
“People were not happy with me. They drove to my house and blew their horns every morning. The automobile industry also made a big noise,” he said. “But I did not listen much.”
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
Taiwan’s rampant thesis and dissertation plagiarism has reduced the value of degrees, bringing the academic system’s public credibility to the brink of collapse. Data published on Retraction Watch — a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers — showed that 73 papers written by Taiwanese researchers were retracted from international journals between 2012 and 2016 due to fake peer reviews, the second-highest in the world behind China. Based on the size of the academic population, Taiwan was the highest in the world, making it academically a pirate nation. Academic fraud in Taiwan can be divided into several types: the listing of coauthors;