There have been many bad laws in US history. Some bills were poorly conceived; some were cruel and unjust; some were sold on false pretenses. Some were all of the above.
Yet has there ever been anything like “Trumpcare,” the health legislation Republicans rammed through the US House of Representatives last week? It is a miserably designed law, full of unintended consequences. It is a moral disaster, snatching healthcare from tens of millions mainly to give the very wealthy a near-trillion-US-dollar tax cut.
What really stands out, however, is the Orwell-level dishonesty of the whole effort. As far as I can tell, every word Republicans, from US President Donald Trump on down, have said about their bill — about why they want to replace former US president Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, or “Obamacare,” about what their replacement would do and about how it would work — is a lie, including “a,” “and” and “the.”
And what does it say about the state of US politics that a majority of the representatives of one of our major political parties has gone along with this nightmarish process?
Before taking back the White House, Republicans attacked “Obamacare” for many things. For one thing, they claimed that it was rushed through without proper debate.
They also claimed that Americans were getting a raw deal. Deductibles were too high, they claimed; so were premiums. They promised to bring these costs down, to provide, as Trump insisted he would, coverage that was “much less expensive and much better.”
Meanwhile, they promised to keep the things people liked about “Obamacare” — whether or not voters knew they were getting those good things because of “Obamacare.”
Nobody would be thrown off Medicaid; nobody would be denied affordable coverage because of pre-existing conditions.
Then came the reality of Republican legislation. “Obamacare” was debated and analyzed for many months; “Trumpcare” was thrown together so fast it is hard to believe any significant number of those voting for it even had time to read it. And it was, of course, pushed through the House without giving the US Congressional Budget Office a chance to estimate its costs, its effects on coverage, or anything else.
Even without a proper analysis, however, it is clear that “Trumpcare” breaks every promise Republicans ever made about health. Deductibles will rise, not fall, as insurers are set free to offer lower-quality coverage. Premiums may fall for a handful of young, healthy, affluent people, but will rise and in many cases soar for those who are older (because age spreads will rise), sicker (because protection against discrimination based on medical history will be taken away) and poorer (because subsidies will go down).
Many people with pre-existing conditions will find insurance either completely unavailable or totally out of their financial reach. In addition, the government-funded Medicaid social healthcare program will be cut back, with the damage worsening over time.
The really important thing, however, is not just to realize that Republicans are breaking their promises, but to realize that they are doing so with intent. This is not one of those cases where people try to do what they said they would, but fall short in the execution.
This is an act of deliberate betrayal: Everything about “Trumpcare” is specifically designed to do exactly the opposite of what Trump, Speaker of the US House of Representatives Paul Ryan and other Republicans said it would.
Which raises two questions: Why are they doing this, and why do they think they can get away with it?
Part of the answer to the first question is, presumably, simple greed. Tens of millions would lose access to health coverage, but — according to independent estimates of an earlier version of “Trumpcare” — people with incomes over US$1 million would save an average of more than US$50,000 a year.
There is a powerful faction within the Republican Party for which cutting taxes on the rich is more or less the only thing that matters. And on a more subjective note, do you not get the impression that Trump gets some positive pleasure out of taking people who make the mistake of trusting him for a ride?
As for why they think they can get away with it — well, is recent history not on their side? The general shape of what the Republicans would do to healthcare, for the white working class in particular, has long been obvious, yet many people who were sure to lose, “bigly,” voted Trump anyway.
Why should Republicans not believe they can convince those same voters that the terrible things that will happen if “Trumpcare” becomes law are somehow liberals’ fault?
And for that matter, how confident are you that mainstream media will resist the temptation of both-sides-ism, the urge to produce “balanced” reporting that blurs the awful reality of what “Trumpcare” will do if enacted?
In any case, let us be clear: What just happened on healthcare should be treated as just another case of cynical political deal making. This was a “Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength” moment, and it may be the shape of things to come.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.