In a photograph of New Power Party Executive Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) speaking on Thursday at a review of the government’s Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program proposal, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Huang Chao-shun (黃昭順) is leaning on the podium blowing a whistle, a look of cold determination on her face. She is trying to deter Huang from making his point and disrupt the review of the proposals.
“All you [KMT lawmakers] do is blow whistles and yell meaningless slogans,” Huang said. “It seems as if the KMT is helping the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) approve the budget without allowing an examination of it.”
Huang made a similar observation at a news conference two weeks ago, when he criticized the KMT for “throwing a tantrum” and allowing the DPP to pass the bill at the legislature’s Economics Committee without proper review.
During that committee meeting, KMT Legislator Sufin Siluko (廖國棟), the party’s caucus whip, flipped over a table in protest. In Thursday’s meeting, the fifth attempt to review the proposed bill, he threw flour and water over other legislators after he and DPP Legislator Chung Kung-chao (鍾孔炤) got into a shoving match. He was then chased and struck by DPP Legislator Chen Ying (陳瑩).
Scenes like this are all too common in Taiwan’s legislature and they are a national disgrace. If you type “Legislative Yuan” in Chinese in a YouTube search, the first predictive text suggested search is “legislative yuan fighting.”
Thursday’s meeting started at 9am — with paramedics apparently on standby — but was promptly called to recess 20 minutes later because of the chaos that broke out and not resumed until after 3pm, wasting an entire day that could have been given to reasoned debate.
The infrastructure program is a set of proposals to stimulate sectors and industries nationwide with a budget of NT$880 billion (US$29 billion) over eight years. It is a complex plan that would clearly lead to much disagreement among governing and opposition parties as to how exactly the stimulus packages are to be budgeted and managed.
One would imagine there to be a certain amount of cross-party consensus on the need for infrastructure improvements, industrial upgrades and development of emerging sectors, such as renewable energy sources and digital technology. Surely, it is incumbent on the nation’s elected representatives, irrespective of party affiliation, to iron out the best possible plan for the future of the nation and the people. This is no time for petty politics and adolescent fighting.
Presumably the stalling and scuffling in parliament is not the work of individual maverick legislators, but the KMT’s official strategy to derail the government’s proposals.
Is it really necessary? The KMT might well feel that this behavior is its only means of halting the plan, given that it lacks a legislative majority. However, this is only true if the passage of government proposals were always a simple game of numbers.
In a healthy democracy there is room for party members to vote against the party whip: The passage of laws should not be a foregone conclusion, nor should the majority party caucus provide a mere rubber stamp for government dictates.
The legislative chamber should be a forum for reasoned debate and consensus-building, embracing ideas from different lawmakers. The Legislative Yuan’s frequent descent into chaos and juvenile jostling is not only ridiculous, but hugely detrimental to the nation.
Following Thursday’s chaos, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) called for an end to the political confrontation and for legislators to instead put their efforts toward the nation’s development, as if she were a teacher reprimanding foolish pupils.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under