The Mainland Affairs Council’s announcement on Thursday that the number of Chinese tourist arrivals dropped 50.2 percent in the first four months of the year compared with the same period last year is sure to lead to much gnashing of teeth and wailing from certain sectors.
It should not.
What it should do is add impetus to the government’s ongoing efforts to attract more tourists from the region and further afield.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) China-centric tourism development efforts were overly grandiose, economically short-sighted and to the benefit of only a few, not all of whom were Taiwanese.
Ever since Beijing began tightening the screws on its Taiwan-bound tourists following President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) election in January last year, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials have complained that Tsai not kowtowing to Beijing and caving in to its demand that she adhere to certain principles and consensuses would cripple the tourism industry and those who work in it.
Barely a word was heard from these critics about how the China-oriented tourism sector had become dominated by “one dragon” (一條龍) firms — Chinese companies that arranged the transportation, accommodation, meals and shopping excursions of Chinese tour groups — meaning that most of the money from such tourists remained in China.
They forgot how such firms sought rock-bottom prices, hurting Taiwan’s hospitality sector and leading to poor service that damaged the nation’s reputation, or the many complaints about rude or destructive behavior by some Chinese tourists.
Taiwan opened its doors to Chinese tour groups on July 4, 2008, when it launched weekend cross-strait charter flights, with the numbers quickly growing when charter flights became daily the following December. Over the next few years, the numbers of Chinese tour groups and independent travelers soared.
Tsai’s critics have barely said a word about how unrealistic the Ma administration’s promises of ever-higher quotas for Chinese travelers were, given the inadequacy of the nation’s tourism industry and transport infrastructure to support such numbers.
The National Palace Museum, Alishan, Sun Moon Lake, the Hualien-Taitung area and even Kenting, not to mention the small Aboriginal villages and communities that suddenly became the focus of Tourism Bureau advertising, were not equipped to deal with the thousands of Chinese tourists that began to descend on them daily, while the focus on catering to Chinese tourists at those sites drove away Taiwanese and tourists from other nations.
Relying on the Chinese market to boost the nation’s tourism industry was an easy solution because of the common use of Mandarin on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, removing the need to find and train guides and other workers in Japanese, Korean, English and Southeast Asian or European languages.
The government is now trying to address the language issue as well as other requirements to broaden the nation’s tourism market, but it will take time. There are no quick and easy solutions.
Those who demand that Tsai and her administration provide an overnight remedy are deluding themselves and others. They are also deluding themselves that the decline in the number of Chinese tourists is just a matter of cross-strait ties.
They should pay attention to China’s reaction to South Korea not heeding its protests about the deployment of an advanced US missile system: Chinese travel agencies in March suddenly announced that they were no longer arranging trips to South Korea.
China is quick to react like any other bully when its wishes or demands are rebuffed.
Taiwan’s inbound tourist numbers are growing annually even without Chinese tourists. There is no reason to mourn their absence.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.