Former French minister of economy, industry and digital affairs Emmanuel Macron, the favorite to win the French presidency next month, has been greeted as a potential savior for financial markets and the EU. That requires a leap of faith.
The problem is that he could be heading into territory that sank others before him. The challenge of reforming France was too much for former French president Nicolas Sarkozy and is only getting harder as a new divide between champions of nationalist protectionism and defenders of open borders realigns post-war politics across the Western world.
Europe is experiencing a political “earthquake” comparable to the era of industrialization, which produced many of the traditional political parties whose support is now collapsing, King’s College London politics lecturer Edoardo Bressanelli said.
That seismic change allowed Macron to fill the vacuum as the French Socialists and Republicans were driven out of the presidential race for the first time in six decades, but it also threatens to swallow him up.
The risk was exposed on Wednesday last week outside a soon-to-close Whirlpool plant near his hometown of Amiens in northern France, where he tried to explain to protesters the importance of respecting the rights of foreign investors.
A woman told him they were tired of governments from the establishment making promises and doing nothing for them.
“I’m not the left, I’m not the right,” Macron shouted over the swarm of angry workers.
Meanwhile, his opponent, National Front candidate Marine Le Pen, has promised to keep the factory open. She attacked Macron as a proponent of “savage globalization.”
The question is not so much whether Macron, 39, will win on Sunday as it is whether he will ultimately succumb to such forces. If he does, Le Pen’s populist alternative will be waiting in the wings.
“You have to ask, what is Macron going to do?” Oxford University professor of European politics Jan Zielonka said.
Zielonka is writing a book, Counterrevolution, that describes how the backlash stems from before the financial crisis or the rise of China to liberal reforms in the 1990s.
“He has to figure it out quickly and, these days, he will have very little time,” Zielonka said.
CALCULATING RISKS
One problem is that Macron’s year-old En Marche movement has no legislators in the French parliament and it will struggle to win the 289 seats needed to secure a governing majority in June elections. So he will still need to rely on lawmakers from the defeated main parties to form a government and drive through legislation.
They might be conflicted about whether to help him succeed, European Council on Foreign Relations director Mark Leonard said.
If they do, they risk losing voters to En Marche, Leonard said, adding that if they undermine him, they might squander a last chance to keep the kind of world they want, boosting Le Pen’s likely next bid for the presidency in 2022.
“For the socialists in particular, it’s a choice between death by asphyxiation or drowning,” Leonard said.
In 1967, a pair of political scientists wrote a seminal paper on what they called the “freezing hypothesis.”
They said that ever since the emergence of socialist and conservative parties to champion either side of the social divide created by 19th century industrialization, the same parties had mostly held sway even as societies changed.
The freeze is now over.
A new cleavage based on nationalism is displacing issues of social class and income distribution as an organizing principle for politics. Traditional parties across Europe are losing support and the transition is proving messy everywhere.
In the Netherlands, where the barriers to entry for political parties are low, new ones have become significant players in the legislature to represent and promote the nationalist reaction. In March elections, the anti-immigration, anti-Muslim Freedom Party came second, while the center-left Labor Party’s share of the vote collapsed from 25 percent to just 6 percent.
In Britain and the US, where the voting system makes it much harder for new parties to muscle in, the established parties of the right — the Conservatives and the Republicans respectively — are themselves mutating to envelop the angry backlash.
Germany, a major beneficiary of international trade, is so far proving an important exception to the populist contagion.
GLOBALISM, NATIONALISM
This new political fault line is nowhere more clearly on display than in the head-to-head for the Elysee Palace. Le Pen wants to pull France out of the eurozone and the EU, halt immigration and harden the nation’s borders. Macron, a former Rothschild banker, supports global trade, immigration and the EU.
Should he prevail as expected, the risk is that Macron suffers the same fate as another hope for European reform, former Italian prime minister Matteo Renzi.
He rose to power in 2014 as the fresh face who would save his country’s economic and political system by reforming it from within, just as Macron is promising to do for France.
However, Renzi resigned late last year. His failure is again driving Italian voters toward upstart populist parties that promise to tear the system down.
Opinion polls are projecting an easy win for Macron, who has never held elected office. That is even after Le Pen and another anti-establishment candidate, Jean-Luc Melenchon of the left, together take about 40 percent of the ballots.
The risk is that Macron goes down in history as just the latest French president to promise and fail to deliver the reforms that the US$2.4 trillion economy needs to stimulate jobs, growth and faith in the political system.
“The first-round vote actually shows that France is in state of fundamental crisis — a crisis of state and a crisis of economy,” Paris-based Sciences Po professor Dominique Reynie said. “I can tell you that if a presidential adviser can within the space of three years become president, it’s because the system is crumbling.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with