The Chinese-language United Daily News published an article titled “Litigation costs to surge: National affairs conference on judicial reform passes resolution on mandatory legal representation.”
In passing the resolution on April 10, the conference adopted a conclusion of the 1999 national conference that favored implementation of a comprehensive legal representation system.
In other words, from the first to the third instance, there should be “mandatory representation by a lawyer” in court.
If the nation adopts such a system, it would significantly raise the public’s litigation costs.
According to Article 466-1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (民事訴訟法) and Article 241-1 of the Administrative Litigation Act (行政訴訟法), an appellant shall appoint an attorney as their representative in the appeal to a high court of second instance or a high administrative court.
Both the high court and the high administrative court operate based on “trial of law” (法律審), so an appellant must specify how the original ruling fails to comply with the law when providing reasons for the appeal.
This requires a certain level of legal expertise: In order to protect an appellant’s rights while giving full play to “trial of law,” requiring representation is appropriate.
Article 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法) states that, in certain conditions, the presiding judge “shall appoint a public defender or a lawyer to defend the accused if no defense attorney has been retained.”
A criminal trial focuses on evidence and cross-examination; the accused is confronted by a prosecutor or a legal representative with profound legal knowledge.
Defendants without a lawyer might be unable to defend themselves, since they are not equally armed. Therefore, it seems necessary for the presiding judge to appoint a lawyer.
However, since the party involved knows the case best, a mandatory lawyer might not always be necessary if defendants choose to defend themselves for financial reasons.
If overall mandatory legal representation is adopted without considering the types of cases or the financial conditions of the parties involved, then people still need to pay attorney’s fees in relatively minor or simple cases.
The economically disadvantaged would need to hire a lawyer to even file a lawsuit, so it would not only increase litigation expenses, but also hurt people’s equal right to court litigation.
This contradicts Article 16 of the Constitution, which states that “the people shall have the right of instituting legal proceedings.”
Although mandatory legal representation could help court litigation proceed smoothly, Taiwan’s social context needs to be taken into consideration.
I suggest that the government should start from two aspects:
First, it should fix the loophole in the Code of Criminal Procedure that does not require mandatory legal representation in the third instance. This would prevent cases being finalized when a judge rejects an unlawful appeal filed by an accused who lacks legal expertise.
Second, it should advise the public to hire lawyers to represent them in “trials of fact” (事實審). If more complex cases are represented by lawyers, courts would become more efficient.
The purpose of judicial reform is to rebuild trust in the judiciary. The right way to proceed is to address what has caused the lack of trust, such as judicial officials’ misconduct in a few cases, lack of expertise and even political intervention in some trials.
However, the national affairs conference on judicial reform ignored the roots of the problem, and is creating more problems by proposing an idealistic, but unrealistic system.
Lee Yung-ran is honorary chairman of the Chinese Association for Human Rights.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and