It is rare that top Beijing officials say something many people outside China can agree with, but Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) was spot-on yesterday with his comment that there would be no winners in an armed conflict between the US and North Korea over Pyongyang’s nuclear program and missile tests.
Wang was not the only top official voicing concerns yesterday about escalating tensions in East Asia. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said “the security environment surrounding Japan is getting tougher” and the North Korean situation “is getting more serious,” while the Kremlin called for “restraint” and warned against “provocative steps.”
The jitteriness over the ever-unpredictable North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has been growing daily over the past week, ahead of today’s “Day of the Sun” in the North, which marks the 105th anniversary of the birth of Kim’s grandfather and the nation’s founder, Kim Il-sung.
The fear is that the grandson will use the anniversary to order yet another missile test, or the nation’s sixth nuclear test, since he has promised “a big day.”
Or Pyongyang could just stage another massive military parade to showcase its hardware; no one knows because Kim Jong-un is even more unpredictable than his father was.
The problem is that someone just as volatile now occupies the White House in Washington and the younger Kim can no longer assume the US will follow the same diplomatic path it has in response to aggressive actions from Pyongyang as it did in his father’s time, or even just two or three years ago.
The Pentagon sent a strike group led by the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson to the Korean Peninsula last week, after Pyongyang test-fired another missile on April 5.
When, two days later, US President Donald Trump ordered a hit on Syria by dozens of Tomahawk cruise missiles, in response to a chemical weapons attack blamed on the Syrian government, this took most people by surprise, including his supporters, his critics, US allies and, most of all, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who had arrived in Florida for talks with Trump just hours earlier.
Then, on Thursday night, the US dropped its most powerful non-nuclear bomb on an Islamic State target in Afghanistan.
In poker terms, Trump saw Kim Jong-un’s wild man card and raised him.
The trouble is that the ever-paranoid North Korean regime has never behaved rationally or responsibly, and for years has seen a potential US invasion under every rock, so any warnings or cautions from Washington are met with hysteria in Pyongyang.
The Kims have also long been able to count on Beijing and, to a lesser extent Moscow, to watch their back and buffer them from the extreme consequences of their actions.
However, it appears that Beijing might finally be fed up with the Kims’ antics and have started to realize that it has to take tough steps to show Pyongyang that China’s patience and support is not unlimited.
For decades, Beijing’s foreign policy has been predicated on “non-interference” in the affairs of other states — at least that is the party line.
However, on Feb. 19, China announced it would stop importing coal from North Korea in line with UN sanctions, thereby cutting off a key source of foreign exchange for Pyongyang, and this week China said that it might severely curtail its Chinese oil exports to North Korea, something that it has long fought vigorously in the UN Security Council.
Will these two steps be enough to temper the young Kim’s actions? No one knows, and Taiwan, like other nations, can only watch and wait.
Yet if China wants to be recognized as a major player on the world stage, it is long past time that it starts acting responsibly and stops propping up the Pyongyang regime.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with