The Cabinet has approved a budget of NT$880 billion (US$29 billion) for its Forward-Looking Infrastructure Development Program and plans to boost it by amending the Government Procurement Act (政府採購法), which stipulates the price-based open tender as the standard method of procurement. The amendment is likely to run into opposition.
However, if the lowest-tender procurement method is used in the implementation of the stimulus, it might lead to construction delays and substandard quality.
In the early days of government procurement, major construction projects could be handled through price negotiations. Because the agencies in charge of the projects were administrative bodies whose mission was national construction, they were able to complete Taiwan’s key projects on time and with high quality.
In 1992, construction firms were invited to bid for a road widening project on the Sun Yat-sen Freeway (National Highway No. 1). The prospective contractors pulled out of the bidding process after failing to reach an agreement with the National Freeway Bureau on the negotiated price.
Later, lowest-tender selection was applied, which led to savings of NT$1.7 billion. The rules governing price negotiations became a sunset clause during the period before the act came into force.
Taiwan then entered a new age of government procurement, lowest-tender selection became the rule and best-value selection became the exception.
The public’s misgivings about best-value procurement prompted the government to make lowest-tender procurement the rule and restrict the use of best-value procurement. However, a few years later, the Cabinet told the ministries to discourage lowest-tender procurement.
Authorities have been vacillating between lowest-tender and best-value procurement methods ever since the act’s inception.
Taiwanese might value preventing fraud in construction projects over generating revenue, but if civil servants are constantly under suspicion of malfeasance and graft, how can they be expected to implement best-value procurement?
It is time for the Cabinet to adopt a new mindset, let us call it “government procurement 3.0.”
First, civil servants have a duty to uphold contractors’ legitimate interests. The rule that civil servants must not seek profit concerns improper interests — it does not mean that officials cannot seek to ensure contractors’ legitimate interests.
As for the populist attitude of suspecting civil servants of involvement in graft and contractors of doing shoddy work and using inferior materials, the Cabinet should refute such claims and clarify the situation. Civil servants have a duty to ensure that contractors who make successful bids can also make a profit.
Second, the government should focus on value rather than price in procurement and establish a value-based procurement system engaging departments concerned with procurement, financial control, civil service ethics, auditing, oversight, investigation and prosecution.
Value-based procurement implies innovative approaches to engineering methods, technology, materials and management, with the aim of improving quality and competitiveness.
The third point is the optimization of construction project life-cycle costs. The Cabinet’s investment plan only covers the initial construction costs. The operational period would last for decades, and life-cycle maintenance costs and end of life costs should be factored in.
Optimizing a project’s life-cycle cost is far more important than minimizing the cost of construction.
Hsieh Ting-ya is chairman of National Central University’s Graduate Institute of Construction Engineering and Management.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under