The Cabinet has approved a budget of NT$880 billion (US$29 billion) for its Forward-Looking Infrastructure Development Program and plans to boost it by amending the Government Procurement Act (政府採購法), which stipulates the price-based open tender as the standard method of procurement. The amendment is likely to run into opposition.
However, if the lowest-tender procurement method is used in the implementation of the stimulus, it might lead to construction delays and substandard quality.
In the early days of government procurement, major construction projects could be handled through price negotiations. Because the agencies in charge of the projects were administrative bodies whose mission was national construction, they were able to complete Taiwan’s key projects on time and with high quality.
In 1992, construction firms were invited to bid for a road widening project on the Sun Yat-sen Freeway (National Highway No. 1). The prospective contractors pulled out of the bidding process after failing to reach an agreement with the National Freeway Bureau on the negotiated price.
Later, lowest-tender selection was applied, which led to savings of NT$1.7 billion. The rules governing price negotiations became a sunset clause during the period before the act came into force.
Taiwan then entered a new age of government procurement, lowest-tender selection became the rule and best-value selection became the exception.
The public’s misgivings about best-value procurement prompted the government to make lowest-tender procurement the rule and restrict the use of best-value procurement. However, a few years later, the Cabinet told the ministries to discourage lowest-tender procurement.
Authorities have been vacillating between lowest-tender and best-value procurement methods ever since the act’s inception.
Taiwanese might value preventing fraud in construction projects over generating revenue, but if civil servants are constantly under suspicion of malfeasance and graft, how can they be expected to implement best-value procurement?
It is time for the Cabinet to adopt a new mindset, let us call it “government procurement 3.0.”
First, civil servants have a duty to uphold contractors’ legitimate interests. The rule that civil servants must not seek profit concerns improper interests — it does not mean that officials cannot seek to ensure contractors’ legitimate interests.
As for the populist attitude of suspecting civil servants of involvement in graft and contractors of doing shoddy work and using inferior materials, the Cabinet should refute such claims and clarify the situation. Civil servants have a duty to ensure that contractors who make successful bids can also make a profit.
Second, the government should focus on value rather than price in procurement and establish a value-based procurement system engaging departments concerned with procurement, financial control, civil service ethics, auditing, oversight, investigation and prosecution.
Value-based procurement implies innovative approaches to engineering methods, technology, materials and management, with the aim of improving quality and competitiveness.
The third point is the optimization of construction project life-cycle costs. The Cabinet’s investment plan only covers the initial construction costs. The operational period would last for decades, and life-cycle maintenance costs and end of life costs should be factored in.
Optimizing a project’s life-cycle cost is far more important than minimizing the cost of construction.
Hsieh Ting-ya is chairman of National Central University’s Graduate Institute of Construction Engineering and Management.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry