Long before Google started working on cars that drive themselves and Amazon was creating home appliances that talk, a handful of researchers in Canada — backed by the Canadian government and universities — were laying the groundwork for today’s boom in artificial intelligence (AI).
However, the center of the commercial gold rush has been a long way away, in Silicon Valley. In recent years, many of Canada’s young AI scientists, lured by lucrative paydays from Google, Facebook, Apple and other companies, have departed. Canada is producing a growing number of AI start-ups, but they often head to California, where venture capital, business skills and optimism are abundant.
“Canada is not really reaping the benefits from this AI technical leadership and decades of investment by the Canadian government,” said Tiff Macklem, a former senior deputy governor of the Bank of Canada who is dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto.
Now bringing AI back is a priority for the Canadian government, companies, universities and technologists.
The goal, they say, is to build a business environment around the country’s expertise and to keep the experts its universities create in the country.
And they want to build on the tenacity of veteran researchers like Geoffrey Hinton, Richard Sutton and Yoshua Bengio, who developed techniques that opened the door to remarkable improvements in an AI technology called machine learning, even as many computer scientists and the tech industry considered their work to be an unpromising backwater.
There are encouraging signs, including new government funding, big company investments, programs to nurture start-ups, and the changing habits of homegrown entrepreneurs and US venture capitalists.
In its new budget, the government of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau pledged US$93 million to support AI research centers in Toronto, Montreal and Edmonton, which are to be public-private collaborations.
The Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Toronto, announced two weeks ago, will be one of them. The institute begins with commitments of US$130 million, about half the money coming from the national and provincial governments and the other half from corporate sponsors like Google, Accenture and Nvidia, as well as big Canadian companies like the Royal Bank of Canada, Scotiabank and Air Canada.
Hinton, who was hired by Google in 2013, but remains a professor at the University of Toronto, will serve as its chief scientific adviser.
The new institute will be in the Mars Discovery District, a cluster of buildings in downtown Toronto run by a public-private partnership, that is home to many tech start-ups including AI companies.
Major technology companies, like Google, Microsoft and IBM, are adding to their AI research teams in Canada. So are companies in other industries.
Last year, General Motors said it was going to locate one of its research and engineering hubs for self-driving cars in the Toronto suburb of Markham.
Thomson Reuters announced it would open a center for “cognitive computing” in Toronto for research into new ways professionals will use information and technologies to assist decisionmaking.
Building businesses that use AI is an economic imperative for Canada. The Canadian tech industry has stalled in recent years. Nortel, Canada’s big telecommunications equipment maker, declared bankruptcy in 2009 and was wound down over the next several years.BlackBerry, once a leader, has faded in the smartphone market.
The experience of two start-ups applying AI technology to drug discovery illustrate the challenges — and the opportunities — facing Canadian start-ups.
Atomwise, a company that uses AI technology to predict what new molecules might combat specific diseases like multiple sclerosis, was founded in 2012. Its chief executive, Abraham Heifets, earned his doctorate in computer science from the University of Toronto.
According to Heifets, when he sought funding, one potential Canadian investor said people had tried the same thing 20 years ago.
“What could possibly be new?” Heifets said the investor had asked, and turned him down.
Later, Heifets went to the Bay Area and met with Timothy Draper, founder of the venture capital firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson.
Draper said that he had invested in a couple of companies trying a similar approach 20 years ago. That did not deter him from trying again.
“That’s a cultural issue, a different appetite for risk and willingness to accept failure,” Heifets said.
Atomwise moved to San Francisco to be close to its investors and the region’s enormous talent pool.
By contrast, Deep Genomics, founded in 2014, has stayed in Canada, and its US-based venture backers encouraged it to remain in Toronto.
Brendan Frey, the chief executive, studied under Hinton at the University of Toronto, and he has spent years on research that combines deep-learning AI and cell biology. When he hires software engineers, he asks them to make multiyear commitments.
“There are a lot of distractions in the Bay Area,” said Frey, who is also a professor at the University of Toronto and a cofounder of the new Vector institute. “The hype is a little too hot down there. Besides, we have some of the best talent in the world here.”
Atomwise and Deep Genomics were participants in different years in a program called the Creative Destruction Lab. Founded in 2012 by Ajay Agrawal, a professor at the Rotman School, the lab was set up to help technology-intensive start-ups. They are typically founded by a doctorate researcher who has worked on an idea for five years, but has little or no business experience.
In 2015, the program tilted toward AI start-ups, with 25 companies admitted. Last year, 50 AI start-ups were admitted, and this year will likely have 75, Agrawal said.
The program lasts nine months, with fall and spring terms, much like a school year. The participants gather every eight weeks in Toronto for two days to make presentations, listen to advice and set goals for the next eight weeks.
At every gathering, at least one and sometimes several companies are voted out. The voters are a growing group of tech entrepreneurs and investors whom Agrawal has recruited.
One of the X factors in Canada’s drive to develop an AI industry is the administration of US President Donald Trump.
Canadian AI scientists say they have received a stream of inquiries from US researchers concerned about the new administration’s stance on immigration and other policies.
Should there be a northward migration, it would not the first time. Hinton settled in Canada in 1987 in part because of the US’ clandestine support for the Contra guerrillas who sought to overthrow the left-wing Sandinista government in Nicaragua.
Hinton, who is from Britain, was at Carnegie Mellon University at the time, and he realized that continuing his research in the US would have meant accepting funding from the administration of then-US president Ronald Reagan.
“I preferred Canada,” Hinton said.
Sutton left the US to become a professor at the University of Alberta in 2003, after US troops landed in Baghdad.
Then-US president “George [W.] Bush was invading Iraq,” he said. “It was a good time to leave.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations