Hong Kong has been a special administrative region of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since 1997, and Beijing has promised that it would let the Hong Kong chief executive rule the territory based on the “one country, two systems” policy.
Still, over the past two decades, Beijing has been behind all appointments, from those to the Election Committee, which should head the so-called “universal suffrage,” to chief executives. While it is true that there is “one country,” there are certainly not “two systems.”
Public support for losing candidate former Hong Kong secretary of finance John Tsang (曾俊華) in last week’s chief executive election was in fact twice that of the winning candidate, former Hong Kong chief secretary for administration Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥), but Lam received twice the number of votes that went to Tsang. This shows that whoever is picked by Beijing wins. China’s version of democracy is a distortion.
Hong Kong was leased to Great Britain by the Qing Dynasty in 1841, then witnessed the transfer of Chinese power from the Qing to the Republic of China (ROC), and then again from the ROC to the PRC.
The switch from the imperial system to right-wing and then left-wing authoritarian rule was a sharp contrast to British rule of law. Despite the absence of a democratic system, the territory used to enjoy a high degree of freedom, but following the handover to China, the “Pearl of the Orient” no longer shines with the same luster.
China claims to be Hong Kong’s “birth mother,” which was forced by a great power and lured by the gains to lease it to its “foster mother,” Great Britain. China used nationalist sentiment to regain the territory, but deep down, Beijing has been jealous of Hong Kong’s development under the rule of another nation.
As the PRC has become more developed, wealthier and stronger, it has insisted on oppressing the territory just to force it to bow its head.
The practical implementation of “one country, two systems” shows that China is saying one thing, but doing another. Calling it “two systems” is a misnomer.
Whether Hong Kongers like it or not, Beijing picked Lam as chief executive. “Socialism with Chinese characteristics” and “democracy with Chinese characteristics” are uniquely Chinese definitions that are very different from anyone else’s.
Hong Kong’s experience since 1997 is similar to Taiwan’s experience after 1945, because for both, any hope for the “motherland” has become a nightmare.
Taiwan was ceded to Japan, while Hong Kong was leased to Great Britain, but nevertheless, they were both colonized. Both Great Britain and Japan modernized early on, and both follow the rule of law. Both British and Japanese colonial rule stood in sharp contrast to Chinese rule. Moreover, national awareness raised people’s hopes of becoming a modern nation, and independence has become an option.
Only by knowing China will it be possible to understand it, and having been ruled by China creates an even stronger wish to cast off the “motherland.”
In their confusion, Taiwanese once welcomed the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government when it arrived from China, but the nightmare of the 228 Incident in 1947 woke Taiwanese up and they began attempting to build a free and democratic nation.
For Hong Kongers, the “1997 dream” has been dashed, as they have finally come to realize that they should never expect the Chinese Communist Party to offer them freedom and democracy.
A nation should be a shared community of free individuals. Taiwanese have struggled for more than half a century, while Hong Kongers have just started their quest of for an identity of their own.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations