People are not getting dumber, despite what a prolific writer of fake news told the Washington Post last fall, but something funny is going on with the US media. There has been an apparent surge in fabricated stories, while the US president has accused the New York Times and other traditional journalism outlets of producing “fake news.”
With facts seemingly up for grabs, scientists are starting to see evidence that both ends of the political spectrum have splintered off into alternative realities, but it is not just a matter of social media isolating conservatives and liberals in echo chambers.
Instead, researchers who study how people share news via Facebook and Twitter say concerted efforts to misinform the public are becoming a threat. New forms of social media help deceivers reach a far larger audience than they could find using traditional outlets.
Illustration: Mountain People
Behavioral and computer scientists are searching for solutions. Part of the problem dates back to our evolution as social animals, they say.
“We have an innate tendency to copy popular behaviors,” said Filippo Menczer, a professor at the Center for Complex Networks and Systems Research at Indiana University, and one of several speakers at a two-day seminar on combating fake news.
That tendency can get people to notice and repeat not just fake news, but fake news from fake people -— software creations called bots. Bots, which automatically post messages to social media, get their strength in numbers, making it look like thousands of people are tweeting or retweeting something.
Menczer, who has a background in both behavioral and computer science, has studied the way bots can create the illusion that a person or idea is popular. He and his colleagues estimate that between 9 percent and 15 percent of active Twitter users are bots.
The phenomenon he described reminded me of experiments with animals that engage in a behavior biologists call “mate copying.”
In certain bird species, for example, females prefer males who are already getting attention from other females. Such species are prime targets for manipulation with fake birds. In an experiment on a bird called a black grouse, scientists surrounded otherwise unremarkable males with decoy females, after which real females mobbed the popular-looking males like groupies. (The males were also fooled, in that they immediately tried to mate with the decoys.)
In studying how this works with Twitter users, Menczer and his colleagues created a program to distinguish bots from people. What he learned was that ideas being promoted by bots can hit the popularity jackpot if they get retweeted from a well-connected or prominent human.
Such people often get a lot of bots vying for their attention for just that reason, Menczer said.
Shortly after November last year’s US presidential election, he said, then-US president-elect Donald Trump was inundated with bots telling him that 3 million illegal aliens voted for his opponent. Trump later tweeted this same information.
A human source has been connected to the rumor, but the bots could have made it look like it had the backing of hundreds more people, as well.
Others mapping the social media landscape see different patterns of deception on the right and left.
Yochai Benkler, codirector of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society at Harvard, has seen political asymmetry using an open-source system called Media Cloud, which follows how stories circulate on social media.
Mapping the flow of more than a million stories, he found that people who share left-leaning partisan news also tend to share news from the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNN and other sources with traditions of accountability. Those who shared items from right-leaning sites such as Breitbart were much less likely to circulate stories from such mainstream news sources.
In a piece Benkler coauthored in the Columbia Journalism Review, he said his data revealed a pattern of deception among many right-leaning sites.
“Rather than ‘fake news’ in the sense of wholly fabricated falsities, many of the most-shared stories can more accurately be understood as disinformation: The purposeful construction of true or partly true bits of information into a message that is, at its core, misleading,” he and his coauthors wrote.
In an ironic twist of fate, Menczer became the subject of just such a hodgepodge of true and false statements. He had already received some media attention in the Wall Street Journal and other publications for his work on the way ideas, or “memes,” spread through social media. None of the mainstream stories suggested he was up to anything sinister.
Then, in 2014, the Washington Free Beacon published a story headlined “Feds Creating Database to Track ‘Hate Speech’ on Twitter.”
The problem was that there was no database, and nobody had tried to define either hate speech or misinformation.
The true part was that Menczer got some money from the National Science Foundation. And in one of his grant applications, he had proposed that the results might be useful for people trying to study the spread of misinformation or hate speech.
The misleading story got echoed through conservative sites such as Breitbart, which suggested Menczer’s project was a plot to suppress free speech. It then reached Fox News’ Megyn Kelly, who devoted part of her show The Kelly File to the issue. It offered no additional facts, but it did ramp up the innuendo and outrage.
How an academic who studies the flow of information on social media morphed into a stooge for “bureaucrats” engaged in policing free speech, Kelly never said.
These days you do not have to be paranoid to worry about the US government spying, but Twitter is a public forum and there is no reason to keep scientists from studying how it influences public opinion. Science and the Columbia Journalism Review eventually debunked the scandal.
Still, if anyone might see a silver lining in being part of a media attack, it would be someone who studies the media.
Menczer said that, unfortunately, having to defend himself and colleagues against disinformation was not particularly enlightening — not enough to be worth the time it took away from his research on the way disinformation spreads.
From his perspective, it was about as helpful as a flu researcher contracting the flu, but the incident did provide a piece of anecdotal evidence for the contention that false accusations tend to stick to people even after they are debunked.
Even other researchers sometimes consider his project “controversial,” Menczer said.
In that way, the critics won, since they left the public with an indelible association between his work, politicized research and the administration of former US president Barack Obama censoring free speech.
“Never mind that none of this was true,” he said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry