The case in which former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) stands accused of divulging official secrets has once again stirred suspicions about illegal political lobbying.
Two people involved in the official-secrets case have been indicted, and one of them has already been convicted and sentenced. Certain administrative personnel in the prosecutorial system, including the then-general counsel and prosecutor-general, no longer occupy their previous official posts. This is a rather serious case, but until now, the notion of illegal political lobbying has not been clearly defined.
Some people in the legal field say that because there are no laws to deal with political lobbying, it is not possible to investigate that aspect of the case. On the other hand, there are clear regulations and penalty provisions for divulging state secrets, so it is only possible to deal with that aspect.
If that is so, it is all the more reason to think long and hard about how to define what illegal political lobbying actually is. If the government fails to provide a definition, it might lead to serious consequences:
First, malicious politicians could at any time interfere in judicial matters. If the issue of illegal political lobbying is not seriously considered and discussed, it will amount to hinting or even openly announcing that such lobbying is acceptable or even approved of, not only legally, but also socially and culturally. Because illegal political lobbying has not been defined, it will become even more rampant.
If tacit consent is given to illegal political lobbying, it will lead to politics dominating everything else and could even evolve into political threats and hounding. If gangsters get involved, it will evolve into violence and mob rule.
Second, it will become a hotbed for corruption. Everyone knows that illegal political lobbying is a serious matter in both central and local governments. It could be said that local politics is mired in a culture of illegal lobbying.
Take for example environmental pollution. The main reason there is so much serious pollution is that the authorities are not doing their job properly. The main reason authorities do not do their job is behind-the-scenes lobbying and pressure.
In other words, illegal lobbying is a hotbed for corruption because it represents immense behind-the-scenes political and economic interests. Put simply, businesses can pay off politicians and use lobbying to ensure that their illegal activities go unpunished.
Third, the judiciary will be corroded. In theory, the judiciary, including prosecutors, is independent of the legislative and executive branches of government. If the judiciary does not stand up and clearly define what constitutes illegal political lobbying, the judiciary will be further degraded.
The state secrets case will be a landmark that shows whether the judiciary is independent or not. The purpose of clarifying what constitutes illegal lobbying is not to dig into what any particular political figure has done wrong, but to ensure that the judiciary can act independently of politics.
It remains to be seen how the state secrets case proceeds. If the prosecutors only talk about divulging state secrets and not about illegal lobbying, it will in effect turn prosecutorial officials into administrative ones, because it will imply that prosecutors — or the prosecutorial system — do not dare to touch upon the sensitive matter of illegal lobbying.
Not long ago, group two of the Preparatory Committee for the National Congress on Judicial Reform added the issue of illegal lobbying as an important agenda item. The state secrets case provides a vivid case study that is worthy of careful consideration to reach a clear definition of illegal lobbying.
This case not only has implications for the independence of the judiciary — if it is not clearly defined, the judiciary could suffer interference at any time — it will also affect the status of prosecutors and judges, because the public will be watching this case’s investigation, indictment and trial processes.
Everything prosecutors and judges say and do will not just affect the core role and status of judicial officials, but also have a far-reaching influence on the functioning of the entire judiciary.
In other words, the state secrets case is a landmark for the judiciary and will be put under a magnifying glass both now and in future.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor in National Cheng Kung University’s political science department and Graduate Institute of Political Economy.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and