Newspaper reports say the Ministry of Justice has proposed four major measures for prison policy reform, one of which is “to make the parole procedure transparent, allow victims and the community to participate and provide judicial remedy for parole decisions.”
The ministry deserves praise for its initiative, but — in addition to the transparency that it wants to implement in the parole system — two other aspects also need improvement, namely fairness and the predictability of outcomes for prisoners. Only then can the goal of parole system reform be achieved.
The parole application and approval system has a greater influence on inmates than anything else. However, it has often been the target of public criticism, because assessment involves many conditions that are subjectively judged by a parole board.
This results in all kinds of variables affecting approval or denial, even to the extent that assessment standards vary from prison to prison, depending on the attitudes of prison directors. The lack of objective standards makes the parole system not only unfair, but also unpredictable. This is where the real problem lies.
To achieve transparency in the system, the ministry proposed to assess prisoners according to the circumstances of their crimes, their post-crime attitude and behavior and their risk of recidivism.
However, assessment of offenders’ post-crime attitude and behavior involves the opinions of victims and the community, so there is still uncertainty arising from subjective factors.
Furthermore, if parole decisions still consider “substantial evidence of remorse” as an important (but subjective) factor, and if parole board members who are not corrections experts are expected to — in a very short meeting — examine a prisoner who they do not know much about and determine whether they are remorseful, then even if the procedure is transparent, it does not really meet the requirements of fairness and predictability. It is a pity that the reform measures do not get to the heart of the problem.
For the parole system to achieve fairness and predictability, it will be necessary to correct numerous weaknesses that have hitherto existed. The ministry could consider the following six points when thinking about how to reform the parole system:
First, to establish standards regarding “substantial evidence of remorse,” to firmly establish legal fairness and predictability.
Second, parole board members should be given ample time to examine applications, and prisoners should be given the chance to present a verbal argument, thus achieving the purpose of substantial examination.
Third, as stipulated in Article 75 of the Statute of Progressive Execution of Penalty (行刑累進處遇條例): “Where a level one prisoner is found eligible for legal parole, the appertaining petition should be filed with the competent authorities as soon as possible,” with no need to obtain the decision of a parole board.
Fourth, the time a prisoner must wait to reapply for parole is too long and should be shortened.
Fifth, consistent times should be set for parole assessments and the implementation of approvals to prevent time differences for the release of inmates from different prisons, thus achieving substantial fairness.
Sixth, a time limit should be set for judicial remedy, thus preventing the remedial process from becoming a mere formality.
Hopefully, besides making the procedure transparent, the ministry can substantially improve its fairness and predictability and thoroughly reform the parole system, allowing prisoners to make an early return to society and achieving the ultimate aim of safeguarding human rights.
Lee Yung-ran is honorary chairman of the Chinese Association for Human Rights.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs