Chinese academic Zi Zhongyun (資中筠) once lamented how little China had changed over the previous 100 years. In the late 1800s, the country was controlled by the empress dowager Cixi (慈禧太后) and the Boxer rebels. With the recent nationalist campaigns against South Korea and South Korea’s Lotte Group, their modern-day heirs have entered the stage.
Beijing has often tried to unite its people by playing the anti-imperialist card and retelling its history of being ravaged by Western imperialist powers. However, it has never felt the need to reflect on its own history of invading and bullying countries.
Even today, when dealing with South Korea, Vietnam, Myanmar and other neighbors, Beijing cannot hide its arrogance, as if it were still the suzerain it was during the Qing Dynasty.
In a naked threat to South Korea, a Chinese state-owned media outlet said: Considering its “extremely limited resources, over-developed domestic markets, total reliance on exports and political chaos, this peninsular country is allowing the US to take advantage of it while offering itself up as cannon fodder, offending China and Russia, befriending distant countries and attacking close neighbors, exerting itself for the sake of someone else without getting anything for it.”
Meanwhile, Beijing claims it has a number of countermeasures against Seoul’s installation of a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system, including a high-level personnel reshuffle, terminating economic cooperation and increasing diplomatic pressure, adding that “every single one of these measures could turn the clock back 10 to 20 years in South Korea.”
A Chinese state-owned media outlet even tried to intimidate South Korea by saying it should heed the last words of Qin Dynasty prime minister Li Si (李斯), who — before he was executed by being cut in half in Xianyang City — famously said that he wished he could go rabbit hunting with his son and hound in his hometown.
Whatever the powerful do, others will follow. In China, where people are expected to be patriotic regardless of age, even children have to show their love for the country.
Several elementary schools in China have organized large-scale “anti-Lotte” demonstrations, mobilizing all faculty members and students. At those events, elementary-school students shout slogans such as “refuse snacks, boycott Lotte, love China.”
Their voices — childish, but loud as thunder — can be heard from far away and for days. If the South Koreans flirting in TV shows heard those sharp and long cries, they would probably be shivering, scared to death.
Cixi and the Boxer rebels failed to eliminate all Westerners and anyone thought to be related to the West. They only brought more calamity and humiliation upon themselves and China.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who appears determined to make China one of the world’s great powers, has called on the entire population to “roll up their sleeves” and work on bettering the nation, but can his patriotic followers help him achieve his goal?
Bluff and bluster is not going to make South Korea submit to China, and threatening to kill will definitely not earn Beijing any respect from other nations.
If the Chinese Communist Party were to mobilize the public to rob a Lotte Mart, many would happily oblige, because who would not love to be called patriotic when stealing and robbing?
However, if it were to recruit a suicide squad — like the Japanese kamikaze during World War II — to destroy the missile defense system, who would be ready to sacrifice their life for the country?
Iris Chang (張純如), author of The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II, was deeply traumatized by what she discovered while writing the book. What she found most unbelievable was not the brutality of the Japanese, but the cowardliness and selfishness of the Chinese in how they fought each other amid disaster.
Before Chang’s despair led to her suicide, she said that the Chinese have an extremely nasty mentality rarely seen in other people, which makes them willing to trample their own in extremely brutal ways just to please their masters.
American anthropologist Marshall Sahlins made an interesting comparison between the Chinese and the Japanese: Whereas the Japanese generally have a strong sense of morality, the Chinese have had a low moral standard for the past 5,000 years. This deeply ingrained inferiority will not go away simply by traveling to Japan, buying Japanese products, learning Japanese or working in Japan.
Lotte originally had more than 100 supermarkets across China, but due to pressure from the authorities and public, half of them have closed. When this is over, will the Chinese start boycotting products made in the US and Japan?
Yu Jie is an exiled Chinese dissident writer.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations