China has continued to provoke Taiwan. China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Minister Zhang Zhijun’s (張志軍) statement at the joint meeting of the Chinese National People’s Congress and the Chinese People’s Consultative Political Conference in Beijing that “the road toward Taiwanese independence will end in unification” has stirred a backlash in Taiwan.
Beijing has done nothing to correct policy mistakes by the office’s misjudgement of Taiwan and the result will be that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait will part ways.
China’s tough policies are pushing Taiwan further away.
On Feb. 14, the Chinese-language Commercial Times published a report on how the Ministry of Education was closing its Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) office, saying that “according to informed sources, it is widely understood that President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) position that the cross-strait ‘status quo’ will be maintained, but that the government would not discuss the [so-called] ‘1992 consensus’ means that there will be no more trade talks based on the ECFA, and that the Cabinet used this as an opportunity to close down the ECFA task force.”
On Friday last week, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published a report saying that the nation’s eight biggest banks showed no interest in Beijing’s plans to allow Taiwanese investors to set up banks across the Strait.
Huge amounts of capital have been flowing out of China, but Beijing is still trying to undermine Taiwan — although the time when former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) would sell out the nation to assist China is long past.
The 521st issue of the bimonthly Chinese-language Wealth Magazine in late January reported that there is another surge in Taiwanese businesspeople leaving China and that this time they are bringing their money with them and closing factories with no regrets.
Regardless of how confused some of these businesspeople were in the past, they are Taiwanese, and it is the responsibility of the government to do all it can to protect them and prevent China from acting as it sees fit.
The government is taking a low profile on this issue; perhaps this is because it is trying to “coordinate” with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
Xi’s main task this year is to organize the 19th Chinese Communist Party (CCP) congress and he does not want anything to come in the way of his attempts to remove the restrictions on his term in office. If either side makes a big issue out of Taiwanese businesspeople leaving China, it would set off a reaction that demands a response from the Chinese president.
Xi’s political enemies are trying to destroy his plans and how he is dealing with Hong Kong, Zhang’s provocations of Taiwan and Chinese generals who are upsetting Beijing’s relations with the US and Japan by talking a lot of nonsense.
This is why Xi should steer clear of provoking or intervening in reforms in Taiwan and the development of the nation’s ties with the US and others, as well as US-Japan relations.
If he issues threats or support actions by the fifth column to stir up unrest, Taiwan might adjust its approach and how it responds to such actions. Examples of such reactions include top Taiwanese officials and the Mainland Affairs Council’s condemnation of Zhang’s statements.
Taiwan might be a small nation, but it still has bargaining chips that it can use to deal with Chinese threats and subversive activities. If Beijing goes too far, it would be surprising if Taiwan does not stir things up on the eve of the CCP congress, and if the US and Japan do not play along.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations