For many years, the famous Crystal Palace dinner theater in Aspen, Colorado, featured a cabaret song that every audience loved: The Peanut Butter Affair.
It told the story of a CEO who had gone to work one day without properly washing his face and still had a lump of peanut butter on his chin, but none of his employees dared to tell him.
When he got home, his wife told him it was there and he was appalled, but he was even more appalled when he showed up for work over the next few days and eventually “every jerk from the chairman to the clerk had a lump of peanut butter on his chin.”
That spoof of underlings who witlessly mimic their bosses came to mind as I listened to US President Donald Trump’s aides and allies justifying his last Twitter rant on Saturday morning, alleging — without any evidence — that former US president Barack Obama ordered Trump Tower phones be tapped during his campaign last year.
It seemed like the whole Trump team was putting peanut butter on their chins. The only question was who had the biggest lump.
My vote goes to White House deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who told ABC’s This Week that Trump “is going off of information that he’s seen that has led him to believe that this is a very real potential.”
Unspecified information that he has seen? UFOs that he has seen? How is that a standard for accusing his predecessor of a vile crime? Give that woman a four-year supply of Peter Pan.
Sanders is just a flack. More troubling was watching an honorable soldier, US Secretary of Homeland Security John Kelly, dab on some Skippy and defend Trump’s claim on CNN, saying that “the president must have his reasons.”
Then why does the secretary of homeland security not know them and why does the president not share them? Why are you on TV with peanut butter on your chin, saying the president has reasons, but not saying what they are?
That is how a morally bankrupt president soils everyone around him, even such a good man.
Trump ran for office promising to protect Americans from terrorists, immigrants and free trade agreements, but who will protect Americans from him? If he is willing to casually throw the most elemental principles of presidential conduct under a bus— such as not accusing your predecessor of a high crime without evidence, just to divert attention from your latest mess — there is a real problem.
There are so many big, hard things that need to be done, but big hard things can only be done together. That takes a leader who can bring people together to do things worthy of people’s energies and dedication — like proper healthcare reform, immigration reform, tax reform and infrastructure investment, or properly working with China and Russia wherever possible and drawing red lines wherever they must be drawn.
However, it also requires trust in the integrity of that leader — that when things get tough, he will not bail and shoot his aides and followers in the back. There is not a Republican congressman or US ally abroad who today is not asking: Can I trust this guy when the going gets tough, or will Trump lay a fact-free Twitter rant on me? Can I even trust sharing information with him?
Government moves “at the speed of trust,” Stephen Covey says in his book The Speed of Trust.
“There is one thing that is common to every individual, relationship, team, family, organization, nation, economy and civilization throughout the world — one thing which, if removed, will destroy the most powerful government, the most successful business, the most thriving economy, the most influential leadership, the greatest friendship, the strongest character, the deepest love... That one thing is trust,” Covey wrote.
Despite a bizarre number of meetings with Russians, no proof has surfaced that Trump’s team colluded with Russia. However, what the top three US intelligence services have declared is that Russia did hack the election on Trump’s behalf.
As more lives move to cyberspace, understanding exactly how that was done, how it is probably being done in European elections right now and how to deter this new weapon from undermining the West — which is Russia’s goal — is a vital security issue. Without a trustworthy electoral process, everyone is sunk.
Sadly, most of the Republican Party today is morally AWOL, preferring to sweep the Russian hacking under the carpet rather than have a credible, independent investigation. That will lead people to question any collaboration Trump tries with Moscow.
One day soon, something will happen — in North Korea, the South China Sea, Ukraine, Iran — that will require him to make a judgement call.
Trump will have to look the American people in the eye and say: “Trust me, I decided this based on the best information and advice of the intelligence community.” Or: “Trust me, we needed to work with Russia on this.”
Who will believe him? There is nothing more dangerous than a US president who has squandered his trust before he has to lead through a crisis, but that is what happens when he is surrounded by people ready to slather peanut butter on their chins. It greases the decline of companies and countries.
Or, as The Peanut Butter Affair warns: “Strange to think what a guy can do just because everybody thinks he’s right.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry