China’s announcement of a 7 percent rise in military spending for the year came shortly after US President Donald Trump called for a 10 percent increase in the US’ defense budget, prompting renewed scrutiny of how the two countries’ capabilities compare.
While the US military remains the dominant force in Asia and the world, China has been moving from quantity to quality and is catching up quickly in equipment, organization and capability, and is increasingly able to project power far from its shores.
Rapid economic growth, lavish spending and a desire to regain China’s historical role as East Asia’s leading power are helping drive the moves.
Below is a comparison of the present state of the two militaries, based on figures found in recent US government research on China’s capabilities and information from defense think tanks and government Web sites. Some figures are estimates or approximations.
THE BIG PICTURE
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has a total of 2.3 million personnel under arms, constituting the world’s largest standing military. It provides only partial information about its order of battle, the PLA’s mission and future plans, although outside analysts have produced detailed estimates.
US troop strength varies depending on need, but as of Jan. 31, there were 1.4 million active service members spread throughout the services.
BUDGETS
China announced this week that defense spending would rise by 7 percent this year to 1.044 trillion yuan (US$151.3 billion at the current exchange rate). While China has the world’s second-largest defense budget, it is still just a fraction of what the US spends, even if analysts’ estimates of hidden additional spending are taken into account.
Trump’s request for an additional US$54 billion in spending would bring the US defense budget to a record US$603 billion, and that is before including tens of billions of US dollars for overseas military operations. If approved, the increase would mean the US was spending 3.4 percent of its GDP on defense, up from 3.2 percent of GDP last year.
China says its budget this year would equal 1.3 percent of GDP.
GROUND FORCES
Owing to the PLA’s origins as a guerrilla army and former tensions along its land border with Russia, the ground forces continue to dominate, with 1.6 million personnel and a weighty emphasis on armored vehicles (9,150) and heavy artillery (6,246).
The US Army boasts 460,000 personnel, with another 182,000 in the US Marine Corps. It has a smaller emphasis on artillery (1,299) and armored vehicles (8,848), but places a greater emphasis on air support and special forces operations.
AIR POWER
The US can boast more than 13,000 aircraft of all types to China’s nearly 3,000. The gap is especially great in helicopters, where the US has more than 6,000 to China’s 802.
Despite having fewer aircraft, some of which are under the PLA Navy, the PLA Air Force has 398,000 personnel to 308,000 for the US Air Force.
Both air forces are seeking to upgrade their aircraft, although the introduction of the fifth-generation F-22 and F-35 puts the US several years ahead.
China’s stealth fighters remain in the prototype stage, although it has managed to replace more than half of its fighter fleet with fourth-generation aircraft.
NAVY
The PLA Navy has many more vessels (714 to 415), but the US has more where it counts in terms of power projection.
The US has 10 aircraft carriers to China’s one (although more are being built), 62 destroyers to China’s 32 and 75 submarines to China’s 68.
The US Navy has 323,000 personnel to China’s 235,000, reflecting the breadth and depth of a service that operates worldwide.
China’s navy has made strides in that direction since it established a permanent overseas presence by joining in multinational anti-piracy patrols off Somalia in 2008, and has begun exercising in the Western Pacific beyond the “first island chain” that blocks its access to open seas.
MISSILE COMMAND
The PLA has a completely separate branch, the PLA Rocket Force, to operate its formidable arsenal of short, medium and long-range missiles, including those capable of delivering nuclear weapons.
Estimates say China has a stockpile of approximately 260 nuclear warheads for delivery by nearly 150 land-based ballistic missiles and 48 sea-based ballistic missiles, as well as bombers.
The US has an estimated 1,740 nuclear warheads deployed for delivery by the same means.
China’s development of the DF-21D ballistic missile, which is thought to be capable of threatening aircraft carriers, has garnered much attention, although it remains untested in a conflict.
OVERSEAS PRESENCE
China has not fought a conflict outside its borders since it invaded Vietnam in 1979 and it officially eschews overseas alliances. Nonetheless, the PLA has been expanding abroad, from garrisons atop artificial islands in the South China Sea to UN peacekeeping operations, joint naval exercises with Russia in the Mediterranean and the construction of its first overseas base in the Horn of Africa nation of Djibouti.
The US military, by comparison, operates in more than 100 countries, maintains a worldwide network of alliances and is engaged in major conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq and, increasingly, Syria.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry