Taiwan has long been oppressed by “two Chinas”: the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC). After universal suffrage, the nation gradually divided into those who identify with the ROC as a sovereign nation independent from the PRC, and the privileged class within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) who identify with China.
As time went on, the former began working closely with independence supporters, while the latter continued to impose the old idea that the ROC is China rather than an independent nation of Taiwanese. The situation became even more difficult when some members of the latter tried to collude with the PRC.
The “two Chinas” have oppressed Taiwan politically, economically, militarily and culturally. Cultural oppression even grabbed hold of people’s minds. In addition to the authoritarian party-state ideology still common among those who act as intermediaries for cross-strait relations, there is narrow-minded parochialism and selfishness, a lack of tolerance, an inability to see the bigger picture, and an obsession with social status and material rewards. These values are all obstacles to Taiwan’s nation-building efforts.
Making Taiwan independent will take considerable time and require tactical skills. Unity is important, and more important than unity among pro-ROC independence supporters and pro-Taiwanese independence supporters is the consolidation of all pro-localization forces and how they can work to garner more support from those who still lean toward the PRC and the ROC as China.
It is impossible to change the minds of all Taiwanese who support China, especially those with vested interests. Nevertheless, the main goal should still be to try to garner as much support for Taiwanese independence as possible. Unity should be achieved by making independence the national consensus, and transitional justice should be promoted on that basis.
Although reform is just getting started, it has met with a lot of opposition. Many of those affected are making desperate attempts to resist change, some showing their most base nature. Reformers are getting impatient and some are growing overly ambitious, cursing the opposition and even vilifying members of their own party. This has allowed time for supporters of either “China” to recuperate and to counterattack by further dividing the reformers.
We can learn from history: In 1927, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) arrested and executed many KMT members linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Following the heavy loss, the CCP leadership was accused of leaning right. It later organized an uprising to overthrow the KMT government, but due to its lack of patience and poorly designed platforms, it lost 90 percent of its base.
Things did not improve for the CCP until 1936, when it began calling for a “united front” and divided the KMT. During that time, the CCP severely criticized Chiang’s plan to prioritize the suppression of domestic rebels over the country’s defense against invasion. By doing so, the CCP forced the KMT into war with Japan, which led to the KMT army’s overextension, allowing the CCP time to recuperate. As a result, the KMT was defeated by the CCP and forced to retreat to Taiwan.
Taiwanese and the pan-green camp should not make the same mistakes.
Considering Taiwan’s economic and military strength, and its lack of international support, it will be difficult to achieve independence. If it had not been for the US, the KMT would not have handed over power so easily after its election losses. Therefore, one key to improving Taiwan’s political situation is in how it operates independently, as well as with the US.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under