From requiring constitutional changes to pushing for unity in the divided kingdom and reshaping the royal household, the new Thai king is putting an assertive stamp on his rule.
King Maha Vajiralongkorn has made it clear to the generals running the kingdom that he will not just sit in the background as a constitutional figurehead since taking the throne in December last year from a father treated by Thais as semi-divine.
That matters in Thailand, where relationships between monarchy, army and politicians have long determined the stability of Southeast Asia’s second-biggest economy and the US’ oldest regional ally.
Illustration: Mountain People
Predictions by some pundits of a troubled royal transition have proven wrong — at least for now.
“His majesty has proven himself to be very adept at managing the junta and the military,” said academic Paul Chambers of the Chiang Mai-based Institute of Southeast Asian Affairs.
None of more than two dozen serving or former officials, military officers, lawmakers, diplomats or analysts that Reuters spoke to for this story saw any immediate threat to that balance of power.
With jail facing anyone found guilty of insulting the monarchy under the kingdom’s lese majeste laws, few Thais comment openly on royal matters.
Asked for a response for this story, a palace official said it did not comment to the media. A government spokesman declined comment.
King Vajiralongkorn started from a very different place to his father, King Bhumibol Adulyadej, who died on Oct. 13 last year.
When the teenage Bhumibol took the throne in the late 1940s, the future of the monarchy itself looked in doubt.
Building alliances, he quietly re-established the royal aura and authority — becoming ultimate arbiter during military coups and spells of chaos as Thailand changed from a rural backwater to a middle-income kingdom.
King Vajiralongkorn, 64, has spent years abroad, his private life complicated by three marriages, and he has yet to win the public adoration received by his father, but the king’s background puts him on different terms with the generals: He went through military academies; he saw combat against insurgents in the 1970s; he can fly a fighter jet.
In line with protocol, junta members prostrate themselves before the new king at audiences, as palace photographs show.
“The relationship is at least one of obedience,” Paris-based Sciences Po lecturer and researcher Eugenie Merieau said.
The junta was quick to obey when the palace asked for constitutional changes — the first such request in decades.
Changes relating to royal powers were pushed through within days. So was the ability to make further changes to a new constitution that is in the works.
Behind the palace walls, the royal household is being reshaped. More than 20 appointments and promotions have been made by the new king and published in the Royal Gazette.
They include reshuffling senior members of the household, many of whom had held posts for decades under King Bhumibol, and promoting military officials with ties to the new king.
The head of the influential Privy Council, 96-year-old former Thai prime minister Prem Tinsulanonda, remains in place, but half the other members are new.
The six new appointments have increased representation of those with a background in the army’s Wongthewan faction or King’s Guard, where the king served.
Among other notable military promotions was Suthida Vajiralongkorn na Ayudhya within the King’s Own Bodyguard. Often seen at the king’s side, though not publicly designated as his consort, she became a general on the day he took the throne.
Last week, the king appointed a new Buddhist supreme patriarch, ending more than a year of tussling over the position. Parliament restored the king’s authority to do so after 25 years of having a council of monks make the decision.
The new patriarch is from a fraternity closely tied to the monarchy rather than the one the religious council had first proposed.
The big question is what happens when there is a resumption of political competition, suspended after the last military coup in 2014.
The king has stressed unity within the divided kingdom, both in his New Year address and at a late night meeting with the political leadership last month to push for more help for flood victims, Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha said.
That meeting also coincided with the government’s moves to set up a reconciliation committee ahead of elections expected next year.
The aim of the panel is to listen to different political factions, to establish some common ground between them and then come up with an agreement all would sign to ensure a peaceful transition to civilian-led democracy.
One name above all polarizes Thais: Thaksin Shinawatra.
The former “CEO prime minister” was a hero for poorer Thais loyal to his populist movement. Overthrown in 2006, he lives in Dubai to avoid a jail sentence for corruption. His sister, Yingluck Shinawatra, was prime minister from 2011 until just before the 2014 military coup.
Thaksin, a self-made billionaire, is reviled by a Bangkok-based, royalist and pro-army elite.
Conservative politicians voice fears in private of any unity deal that would allow Thaksin to return.
Both Shinawatras have been ahead of many other Thai politicians in adopting gold-framed pictures of King Vajiralongkorn as the banners on their Twitter feeds.
Nobody from their political camp would comment about the monarchy.
“There is a palpable sense of urgency with regard to reconciliation that some politicians say stems from the new king’s call for peace and unity,” said Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue regional director Michael Vatikiotis, who has been involved in reconciliation efforts. “The military government is under some pressure to deliver on the king’s request, which may even speed up the transition back to civilian government.”
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on
The “Wuhan pneumonia” outbreak has become a pandemic, but many countries have yet to come to grips with the worsening severity of this medical crisis. Historian Robert Peckham has studied how the ecology of deadly diseases has changed from the late 19th century until today and, in his 2016 book titled Epidemics in Modern Asia highlights the intrinsic link between global connectivity and emerging infections. The frequency of outbreaks — from SARS in 2003 to swine flu in 2009 and today’s COVID-19 — and their rapid rate of transmission owe much to globalization. Better and cheaper transportation and communications technology have empowered
Early last month, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) was elected party chairman, winning with a seven-to-three majority over pro-Beijing former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), a two-time KMT vice chairman. Chiang’s victory has been interpreted as a generational change and the beginning of major party reform. In his inauguration speech on March 9, Chiang did not mention the so-called “1992 consensus.” Analysts believe that his most urgent task is to attract more young people to the party and win voter trust, and that he does not care about Beijing’s reaction. After joining the party chairmanship by-election, Chiang made his