Seven Hong Kong police officers were on Tuesday convicted of assaulting pro-democracy protester Ken Tsang Kin-chiu (曾健超) during the 2014 Occupy Central protests, also known as the “Umbrella movement.”
In the early morning hours of Oct. 15, 2014, the officers took Tsang to a secluded corner of Tamar Park and proceeded to beat him. A Hong Kong district court found all seven officers guilty of “assault occasioning actual bodily harm,” leaving them each facing a maximum of three years in prison.
The verdict was a sharp warning to the Hong Kong Police Force — and the territory’s government — that violence toward members of the public will not be tolerated.
In a civilized democratic society, there can be absolutely no tolerance of violence perpetrated by organs of the state. If there is, it would mean that there is a tacit acceptance that police are hooligans who have swapped their casual clothes for uniforms, which would mean that police are allowed to use the powers bestowed upon them by the state to engage in uncontrollable violence, a much more frightening idea than the same kind of violence committed by common hooligans.
It took two years and four months for investigators and Hong Kong’s legal system to finally bring these police officers to justice, but how does Taiwan compare to the territory?
On March 24, 2014, when the Sunflower movement was in full swing, blood flowed on the square in front of the Executive Yuan in Taipei. A teacher was left covered in blood, while a doctor fell to the ground, writhing in pain.
Footage clearly shows police brandishing riot shields and batons, attacking unarmed students and lashing out at the heads, faces and backs of protesting members of the public.
The riot police involved in the incident were all captured clearly on camera. Despite this, almost three years have passed since the event took place, and the names, units, ranks and precincts of these officers are still unknown.
The officers in question all have faces: Are investigators unable to cross-check these individuals against the national register of police officers or use facial recognition techniques to discover their identities? If this is somehow not possible, then it is a wonder that police investigators are ever able to track down and arrest any criminals.
It begs the question: Are senior police officers intentionally dragging their feet? Has an investigations unit actually been assigned to this case and is it conducting an investigation?
If riot police who were not involved in the incident want to avoid having their names blackened by those violent officers, why do they not expose the rotten apples hiding within their ranks?
Contrasting the situations in Hong Kong and Taiwan, it is difficult to avoid asking whether Taiwan really is the democratic and civilized society that it claims to be.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor and a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Edward Jones
Since COVID-19 broke out in Taiwan, there has been a fair amount of news regarding discrimination and “witch hunts” against medical personnel, people under self-quarantine and other targets, such as the students of a school where an infection was discovered. Quarantine breakers are almost certainly on the loose and it is only natural for people to be vigilant. One in Chiayi was found by accident at a traffic stop because his helmet was not fastened. However, those who follow the rules by quarantining themselves should be encouraged to keep up the good work in a difficult situation, instead of being
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) has said that there is a huge difference between Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan along the edges of its airspace and invading Taiwan’s airspace. He also said that whether it is US or Chinese aircraft flying along or encircling Taiwan’s airspace, there is no legal basis to say that such actions imply a clear provocation of Taiwan, and asked the Ministry of National Defense not to mislead the public. People who hear this might think that it is not a very Taiwanese thing to say. US military activity in the vicinity of Taiwan
As the nation welcomes home Taiwanese who had been stranded in China’s Hubei Province — arguably one of the most dangerous places on Earth since the novel coronavirus outbreak began in its capital, Wuhan, late last year — problems surrounding the “quasi-charter flights” that brought them back have been largely overlooked. The media used the term to describe the two flights dispatched by Taiwan’s state-run China Airlines because they do not count as charter flights. Taiwanese wanting to board those flights had to travel — most likely by train — more than 1,000km from Hubei to Shanghai Pudong International Airport
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist