Every day, US President Donald Trump’s behavior becomes more worrying. One day he demeans a federal judge who challenges him; the next day, without evidence, he accuses the media of hiding illegal voting or acts of terrorism.
His lack of respect for institutions and truth pours out so fast, you start to forget how crazy this behavior is for any adult, let alone a president, and just how ugly things will get when the US has a real crisis. Crises are baked into this story because of the incoherence of Trump’s worldview.
How so? The world today is more interdependent than ever. The globalization of markets, the spread of cellphones, the accelerations in technology and biology, the new mass movements of migrants and the disruptions in the climate are all intertwined and impacting one another. As a result, the US needs a president who can connect all of these dots and navigate a path that gets the most out of them and cushions the worst.
However, Trump is a dot exploiter, not connector. He made a series of reckless, unconnected promises, not much longer than tweets, to get elected, and now he is just checking off each one, without thinking through the linkages among them or anticipating second-order effects.
It is a great way to make America weak — and overstretched — again.
Where do I start? Trump wants to get tougher with China on trade and security. That is not crazy, but how would I do it? I would organize an alliance of Pacific trading nations that surround China and enlist them in a trade pact that supports US-style rule of law, greater market access for US intellectual property and products and promotes US values — as opposed to China’s.
I would call it the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP for short.
Oh wait, former US president Barack Obama did that, but Trump scrapped TPP on day one without, I am sure, having read it. Now there is every reason to believe that the US’ Asian-Pacific allies will fall even more under China’s economic sway and trade “rules.”
How smart is that?
And by the way, why is labor in Mexico cheaper than in America? One reason is that Mexico has weaker labor rights and environmental standards. What would the TPP require of Mexico and other signatories? That they bring their labor rights and environmental standards closer to those of the US.
Instead, Trump is building a wall to keep out Mexican immigrants and force companies to move to the US. What happened after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, when the border crossings with Mexico and Canada were severely constricted for security? It forced some assembly-line shutdowns at US auto companies, like Ford, because their supply chains stretched to Mexico and Canada. The lower-cost work is done in Mexico and then integrated with higher-value-added work in the US, which enables US automakers to compete on price in Europe, Japan and China.
So what did the US, Canada and Mexico do after the attacks? They created a North American security envelope, explained Seth Stodder, Obama’s assistant secretary of homeland security, so if you fly into Mexico or Toronto from the Middle East, the US Department of Homeland Security now probably knows about it.
“Since 9/11, we and our Mexican and Canadian partners have worked to secure the North American perimeter by sharing information on people and goods coming to our countries, cross-referencing that information against terrorism databases and working collaboratively to identify potential bad actors trying to come to North America,” Stodder said.
If we build a wall and demand that Mexico pay for it, how long will it go on cooperating with us?
If Trump forces all these US-based multinationals to move operations from Mexico back to the US, what will that do? Help tank the Mexican economy so more Mexicans will try to come north and raise costs for US manufacturers. What will they do? Move their factories to the US, but replace as many humans as possible with robots to contain costs.
The UN says there is a record 65 million displaced migrants and refugees, mostly from the developing world, trying to get into secure places like the US or Europe. Why? A mix of civil wars, state failures, climate stresses and population explosions.
What did Trump do in his first week? Appoint climate deniers to key posts and ban US aid to health groups that provide abortion as a family-planning option in developing nations.
Trump wants to partner with Russian President Vladimir Putin to defeat the Islamic State group in Syria — a worthy goal. However, Putin has not been trying to defeat the militants. He has been trying to defeat democracy in Syria to keep the genocidal pro-Russian dictator there in power.
Will that be the US’ goal, too? And who are Putin’s allies in Syria? Iran, Hezbollah and Shiite mercenaries from Pakistan and Afghanistan. Will they be US allies, too?
No. We will enlist Iraqi and Syrian Sunnis to help us, Trump says.
Really? He just barred them from entering the US. How cooperative will they be?
Who else might this ban keep out? Remember Steve Jobs? His biological father was Abdulfattah “John” Jandali. He came to America as a student in the 1950s and studied at the University of Wisconsin. He was from Homs, Syria.
It is amazing what a mess you can make when you only check boxes and do not link them.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with