Last week, Transparency International Chinese Taipei published its Corruption Perceptions Index for last year. Taiwan ranked 31st in the world with 61 points, a drop of one place compared with 2015.
Although this could be regarded as an insignificant change, it might drop again, and therefore serves as a cautionary note for the importance of vigilance and a reassessment of how best to achieve clean governance.
Taiwanese need to know which policies or measures are not proving effective in the anti-corruption drive and the reason for this setback in ranking, however small.
This can be summed up in three points:
First, the anti-corruption policy as it stands goes neither far enough nor deep enough. The Ministry of Justice’s Agency Against Corruption was established more than five years ago, but for a variety of reasons, its anti-corruption efforts have been insufficiently comprehensive or far-reaching.
For example, when it was established, the agency was called upon to deal with the case of former legislator Lin Yi-shih (林益世), following which it refocused its efforts to rooting out corruption.
Over the past few years, although the agency has quietly developed its focus on anti-corruption and corruption prevention policies — and has achieved concrete results — its failure to implement a comprehensive approach has meant it has been unable to make inroads into the nation’s bureaucracy.
Although the central government and some local governments — especially the Executive Yuan and the Tainan City Government — have been taking anti-corruption reports seriously and promoting anti-corruption initiatives, these have only been piecemeal; lacking an overall strategy. This inadequate approach to fighting corruption has allowed the efforts to be resisted.
Second, there is the lack of transparency, one of the biggest reasons for corruption. The government began to promote transparency at least 10 years ago; hence the existence of so-called “sunshine” laws.
The passage of the Act on Property-Declaration by Public Servants (公職人員財產申報法) and the Political Donations Act (政治獻金法) notwithstanding, there continue to be blind spots in anti-corruption policy due to difficulties in policy implementation and the lack of transparency in other regulations.
If the government hopes to remain in line with international standards and promote open governance, it needs to do more to reinforce transparency of government information.
For example, the central and local governments mostly have open data on their Web sites. However, the information is either difficult to find or incomplete. That is, the “file management” of governments at all levels leaves a lot to be desired, which is another problem.
Third, there is the proposed public security special law. The law is reportedly still in the development stage and its main focus is counterintelligence and counterespionage.
If implemented, it could set transparency back, compromising the government ethics system and causing the nation’s international anti-corruption ranking to fall again, because if the government promotes or passes the public security special law, the ethics system might be forced to participate in the implementation of security efforts, which might lead to the return of “the second personnel office” system — or embedded “thought police” — that was repealed by former minister of justice Chen Ding-nan (陳定南).
Fortunately, the public security special law is still in the development stage. If it can be stopped in time, it will not retard anti-corruption efforts.
The nation’s fall in the anti-corruption rankings serves as a warning to the government and the public. At the same time, it also provides a good opportunity to consider and review whether there are blind spots in the government’s anti-corruption strategy.
If authorities do not revise, support and promote an anti-corruption strategy action plan, the nation’s international competitiveness and sustainable development might be compromised, regardless of how minor the drop in actual ranking position might be.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor in the Department of Political Science at National Cheng Kung University and a member of the board of directors of Transparency International Chinese Taipei.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry