Divided territories usually create their own ugly landmarks. In Nicosia, now holder of the unenviable distinction of being the world’s last divided capital, the scars of past conflict are brutally evident.
They come in the form of a UN-patrolled buffer zone, a wound that runs east to west across the city and in the dereliction that surrounds it. Roads end at barrels and barbed wire; buildings stand bullet-pocked and empty, gun ports, sandbags and sentry posts slowly decay.
For 43 years these dismal sights have provided the motif to a conflict frozen in time, the most potent symbol of a 70km ceasefire line that has kept Cyprus’ estranged Christian Orthodox Greek and Muslim Turkish communities apart.
Illustration: Mountain People
However, in a dramatic week of international diplomacy, brinkmanship and talks, the starting gun has been fired on a process in which all could soon change. Across the ethnic divide there is conviction that the gaping wound could close.
“This time people aren’t afraid to be optimistic,” said Andreas Mesarites, a Greek Cypriot brand strategist. “This time it feels different.”
What has long been Cyprus’s plight — the inability of its politicians to compromise and concede — changed last week in the elegant, high-ceilinged rooms of Geneva’s UN Palais de Nations in Switzerland. There, Nicos Anastasiades, who heads the island’s internationally recognized Greek-run south, and Mustafa Akinci, who leads its Turkish-run north, narrowed differences to the point where they pored over maps, discussed property rights and began tackling the thorny issues of territorial realignment and troop presence — small, but bold steps to not only put Cyprus back together again, but ending a “status quo” that in many ways is both anomalous and surreal.
Even now, more than four decades after the 1974 Turkish invasion — an operation that cemented a division first created by inter-ethnic fighting in the early 1960s — the two sides are linked by very little. A common sewage system and electricity grid are in place, connecting entities that are only meters apart, but with the exception of trade in home-grown goods practically all other official interaction is stymied.
Few know this better than Phidias Pilides and Fikri Toros. As presidents of the Greek and Turkish Cypriot chambers of commerce, the two men might in different times have much to bicker over. Instead, bonded by the desire for an end to their island’s division, they are good friends who regularly cross the ethnic divide.
“We are both working for the same cause,” said Pilides, seated behind a large glass table in his office with a view out toward the Kyrenia range of the breakaway republic beyond. “On the issue of Cyprus I don’t hide any of my feelings ... we have no secrets.”
Like Toros, Pilides believes that Cyprus is on the cusp of historic change.
“I’d put money on a political solution being agreed in the coming months,” he said. “The talks didn’t end in deadlock, they didn’t collapse ... there is optimism that the reaching of an agreement is still within grasp.”
Any deal will be put to a referendum — another high-risk move whose outcome, in an age of referendum surprises, is far from sure. The last time a peace plan was put to the popular vote in 2004 it was supported by the Turkish Cypriots and roundly rejected by the Greeks.
“Back then,” Mesarites said, “you wouldn’t put a bumper sticker on your car if you believed in a solution. You knew your windows would be smashed.”
However, times have changed. Under the stewardship of Anastasiades and Akinci — who ironically both hail from the southern coastal town of Limassol — Cypriots on either side say they have arrived at a point of hope.
“Finally we have two leaders who are truly committed to a solution,” Toros said. “Men who are willing to take the courageous steps to get there.”
In many ways, Anastasiades and Akinci already know that their people are ahead of them. Years of international isolation have seen growing numbers of Turkish Cypriots seek work in the south and where possible, educate their children there too. With the passage of time passions have abated. In ways big and small, Cypriots from both sides are intermingling — collaborating on communal projects, working together, falling in love.
“For two years I was in a lovely relationship with a Greek Cypriot girl,” said a young Turkish Cypriot behind the till at Rustem’s, a bookshop in the north. “You can’t stop love. You can’t stop people getting on with their lives. A lot of us want a solution. Now it’s up to the politicians to get on and do it.”
About 3km south as the crow flies, Corina Constantinou and Elena Ellina, Greek Cypriot chemists in their 20s, could not have agreed more.
“Of course Cyprus should be united,” said Constantinou, her trendy leather jacket pulled up around her neck as she sipped coffee at Starbucks. “If it wasn’t divided we’d all be so much better off. Maybe on this side it would also stop us building so many concrete blocks which would be better for the environment.”
“And it would be a good way to end the racism which is so ugly too,” Ellina said.
However, like so many Cypriots, both know that the future is fraught with risk.
“It’s not going to be easy,” Constantinou said. “All our lives we’ve heard about this problem and all our lives nothing has changed. Still, I live in hope, I really do. At some point something has to give.”
What will give and how is anyone’s guess. Resolving what has long been regarded as the Rubik’s cube of diplomacy — the west’s longest-running diplomatic dispute — is a tortuous business, as arcane as it is complex. Conciliation cannot come without concession and concession cannot come without pain. To make matters worse, the long hoped for two-state federation not only requires compromise, but approval from NATO rivals Greece and Turkey.
As former colonial master with military bases on the island, Britain also has a say as a guarantor power alongside Ankara and Athens.
That more progress was not made in Geneva last week was blamed squarely on the Greek minister of foreign affairs for digging in his heels on matters of security with Turkey.
“Sadly in our case it doesn’t just take two to tango,” one high-level Greek Cypriot diplomat said. “It involves a folk dance which makes every step that much more complicated.”
In all the politics it is easy to forget the pain. One in three Greek Cypriots was displaced in 1974 when the Turkish army ordered a full-scale invasion in response to a right-wing coup aimed at uniting the island with Greece. Many were forced to flee their homes in hours, hastily burying jewelery, gold and other treasures in courtyards and back gardens. Refugees (though far less) also went the other way, with members of the Turkish Cypriot minority in the south being similarly forced north as the army moved in. For most, it never occurred to them that such a tumult would be anything other than temporary.
In 2003, when the then Turkish Cypriot regime eased travel restrictions — opening up access to the statelet for the first time since the declaration of independence in 1983 — Greek Cypriots could see what they had lost. And often they were shocked. Not by anger or disbelief at seeing so much of the territory’s Greek past erased — street names had changed and churches converted into mosques — but at the kindness of apologetic Turkish Cypriots, who “wished a thousand Virgin Marys” (for many spoke Greek) it had not been this way.
That was the first sign that something had changed.
“For so many years we had painted the face of the devil on the other,” said Nikos Athanasiou, a teacher who led civil society efforts to reach out to the north. “That’s when that stopped.”
However, fear and loathing still haunt Cyprus. Even today, as minefields are cleared and communal activities snowball and supporters of reconciliation take to the streets, there are those who prefer fracture as a state of mind. In the months ahead they will take to the streets, as they have in times past, to ensure the “status quo.”
Only now a new spirit has stirred; a spirit that sees hope in change and change in unity. For Anastasiades and Akinci, who belong to the last generation with common memories of coexistence, it is a spirit they have to harness before it is too late.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry