Ever since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of the Democratic Progressive Party won the presidency in January last year, China has been attempting various tactics to force her to accept the so-called “1992 consensus.”
The former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government claims the consensus refers to an understanding reached during cross-strait talks in 1992 that both Taiwan and China acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
From gimmicks such as blocking Taiwan’s participation at the annual meeting of the World Health Assembly in May last year to tightening controls on the number of Chinese tourists visiting Taiwan, it comes as no surprise that Beijing has also resorted to intimidation by having the People’s Liberation Army Air Force conduct several training missions that circled Taiwan’s airspace over the past few months.
China, obviously desperate after being rattled by the telephone conversation between Tsai and US president-elect Donald Trump last month — the first time a Taiwanese president has publicly spoken with a US president or president-elect since official diplomatic ties between the two nations were severed in 1979 — ramped up its intimidation by sending a flotilla that skirted Taiwanese waters to the south and cruised past the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) late last month.
Beijing then resumed diplomatic relations with Sao Tome and Principe on Monday last week after the African nation severed its relations with Taiwan just five days previously.
China has also been attempting to coerce the Tsai administration by fining Taiwanese seafood restaurant chain Hai Pa Wang for mislabeling items, while Taiwanese shoemaker Feng Tay Enterprises Co was targeted by China’s Fujian Province tax authorities.
Not short on rhetoric, Beijing also stepped up its verbal threats, with the state-controlled Global Times publishing an editorial saying that China “should arrest a few hardcore Taiwanese independence supporters for violating the ‘Anti-Secession Law’ and have them locked behind bars in China.”
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) on Sunday reiterated the importance of Taiwan accepting the “1992 consensus” as the political foundation for cross-strait development, adding that “any attempt to undermine that foundation would see cross-strait relations return to the turbulence of the past.”
Beijing surely must know that this saber-rattling will not intimidate the government in Taipei nor Taiwanese, but rather arouse even more resentment on the part of the Taiwanese toward China and the fictional consensus conjured up by former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起).
A number of polls have clearly indicated that the majority of Taiwanese either oppose or do not support the “1992 consensus” being the foundation of cross-strait interaction.
Prior to Tsai’s telephone call to Trump, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Institute of Taiwan Studies head Zhou Zhihuai (周志懷) said at an academic forum in China on Nov. 30 that Beijing “does not oppose the idea of the 1992 consensus being substituted by a creative alternative.”
Mainland Affairs Council Minister Katharine Chang (張小月) has since said that the council is working on a new cross-strait policy to replace the “1992 consensus.”
If China wishes to promote cross-strait development as it claims, it should view Chang’s remarks as a gesture of goodwill and restart cross-strait communication to seek a viable alternative to the “1992 consensus.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under