There is a Chinese saying that stems from the philosophy in Sun Tzu’s (孫子) ancient text The Art of War (孫子兵法): You can kill 1,000 enemies, but you would also lose 800 soldiers.
Centuries later, the proverb is suddenly apt again, being mentioned frequently in discussions around Beijing. Now, it highlights the potential damage US president-elect Donald Trump could inflict if he makes good on his threat to start a trade war with China, the world’s second-biggest economy.
Having backed off some other campaign pledges, it is unclear if Trump will end up slapping punitive tariffs on China — and Beijing has signaled some optimism he will be more pragmatic in office.
Still, the message from China is that any move to tax Chinese imports would bring retaliation: The US economy would take a hit and Washington would damage its longstanding ties with Asia.
“China wouldn’t like to see that happen,” Fu Ying (傅瑩), who chairs the Foreign Affairs Committee of China’s National People’s Congress and was a vice minister of foreign affairs until 2013, said of the US imposing punitive tariffs.
“But if so happens, it won’t be one-way traffic,” she said last week in Beijing.
While China has warned the US against picking a fight, the prospect of a more protectionist US creates an opportunity for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Asia, where trade-dependent nations are nervous about the potential fallout.
Xi has rushed to portray his country as a champion of free trade and Trump’s actions could give him an avenue to build his clout.
Xi has spoken of his desire for the same great-power status enjoyed by the US, pushing back against American hegemony since World War II.
“The US has been using the approach of carrot and stick, and that is on the rocks,” said Wang Wen (王文), executive dean of the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University in Beijing.
“China’s ‘trade first’ or ‘economic first’ foreign affairs policy in Asia is more advanced compared to the US,” he said. “Asian countries need a peaceful international environment.”
Any dimming of US influence in Asia also presents China with the challenge of managing a regional order that has produced spectacular economic gains under the US’s watch.
Does it impose its agenda not only through economic power, but by shaping geopolitics beyond its borders? Or does it stick to its favored stance of “non-interference,” focused on issues in its self interest like trade and climate change?
“China still lacks the experience in engaging global affairs, and still has a lot to learn in the international arena,” said Yan Xuetong (閻學通), a member of the Consultation Committee of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce.
“There will be challenges in the future for China along with its growing influence, and there could be sensitive international issues that force China to make choices,” he said.
“China holds a clear bottom line that it disapproves of the use of force in handling international disagreements,” said Yan, who is also director of the Institute of International Studies at Tsinghua University in Beijing. “China should work very hard to take a different approach from the US in international affairs.”
For now, China has a two-pronged response to Trump’s elevation: warn him of the consequences of unilateral action and accelerate efforts to secure an Asia-wide trade pact that does not include the US.
Beijing wants to seal the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership — a 16-nation trade pact with Southeast Asian nations plus countries such as Japan and Australia — “as soon as possible,” according to the commerce ministry.
It is one way to pointedly differentiate China from a more inward-looking US. The next round of talks is scheduled in Indonesia from tomorrow.
“Globalization is still the trend in the world,” Fu said.
“[The] US started it, you benefited from it and now you don’t like it. So what’s next? Do you have a substitute? Do you have a better option? The trend is not going to wait,” she said. “Maybe we can better manage it.”
In terms of a direct response, China — the US’ biggest creditor and trading partner — could potentially raise taxes on US imports and shift to alternate nations, she said.
Indeed, she couched Trump’s threats in part as an opportunity.
“There are people in China who would be happy to use that moment” if the US announced tariffs, Fu said.
“There’re quite a few areas where some in China think our interest got hurt in trading, like soybeans — we have completely lost soybean plantation to imports. We have more than a decade of good harvests, but we are continuing to import American wheat. Why should we?” Fu said.
China is the largest importer of US soybeans and bought US$20.3 billion of US agricultural products last year, according to the US Department of Agriculture.
More broadly, if Trump keeps his promise to withdraw from the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership, China could better cement its position in Asia through its advocacy of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, said Alicia Garcia Herrero, chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis SA in Hong Kong.
“A US disengagement from trade with Asia would help, rather than harm, China, while a more aggressive approach to the bilateral relationship with China would risk undermining US interests,” she said in a note.
The US remains a powerful country, but no longer has global hegemony, Yan said.
“The Chinese leadership does not want to challenge the US dominance, but the US has to find a way to deal with China, which is a major power and needs cooperation but not confrontation,” Yan said.
Fu echoed that, describing the current relationship as complementary.
“We can very well work with each other to find solutions to differences, instead of cutting down on each other,” she said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.