In November 2000, as the Florida recount gripped the nation, a newly elected Democratic senator from New York took a break from an upstate victory tour to address the possibility that then-Democratic candidate Al Gore could wind up winning the popular vote, but losing the presidential election.
She was unequivocal.
“I believe strongly that in a democracy, we should respect the will of the people, and to me that means it’s time to do away with the Electoral College and move to the popular election of our president,” Hillary Rodham Clinton said at the time.
Illustration: Yusha
Sixteen years later, the Electoral College is still standing and Clinton has followed Gore as the second Democratic presidential candidate in modern history to be defeated by a Republican who earned fewer votes, in Gore’s case by former US president George W. Bush.
In her concession speech on Wednesday last week, Clinton did not mention the popular vote, an omission that seemed to signal her desire to encourage a smooth and civil transition of power after a divisive election. However, her running mate, Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, highlighted her higher vote total than that of her Republican rival, Donald Trump, in introducing her.
The disparity left a bitter taste in the mouths of many Democrats, whose party won the country’s national popular vote for the third consecutive election, but no longer controls any branch of government.
“If we really subscribe to the notion that ‘majority rules,’ then why do we deny the majority their chosen candidate?” former Michigan governor Jennifer Granholm asked.
Trump himself has been critical of the Electoral College in the past. On the eve of the 2012 election, he called it “a disaster for a democracy” in a Twitter post. Now, after months of railing against what he called a “rigged” election, he has become the unlikely beneficiary of an electoral system that enables a candidate to win the race without winning over the most voters.
None of Clinton’s supporters have gone so far as to suggest that the popular vote tally should delegitimize Trump’s victory, but the results are already renewing calls for electoral reform.
“I personally would like to see the Electoral College eliminated entirely,” said David Boies, the lawyer who represented Gore in the Florida recount in 2000. “I think it’s a historical anomaly.”
Defenders of the system argue that it reduces the chances of daunting nationwide recounts in close races, a scenario that Gary Gregg II, an Electoral College expert at the University of Louisville, said would be a “national nightmare.”
A variety of factors informed the creation of the Electoral College, which apportions a fixed number of votes to each state based on the size of its congressional delegation. The US’ founders sought to ensure that residents in states with smaller populations were not ignored. In an era that predated mass media and even political parties, the founders were also concerned that average Americans would lack enough information about the candidates to make intelligent choices. So, informed “electors” would stand in for them.
Above all, some historians point to the critical role that slavery played in the formation of the system. Southern delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention, most prominently James Madison of Virginia, were concerned that their constituents would be outnumbered by Northerners. However, the Three-Fifths Compromise allowed states to count each slave as three-fifths of a person — enough, at the time, to ensure a Southern majority in presidential races.
On social media on Wednesday last week, some drew connections between that history and what they perceived as an imbalance in the Electoral College that favors Republicans.
“Electoral college will forever tip balance to rural/conservative/white/older voters — a concession to slave-holders originally,” author Joyce Carol Oates tweeted.
To its critics, the Electoral College is a relic that violates the democratic principle of one person, one vote and distorts the presidential campaign by encouraging candidates to campaign only in the relatively small number of contested states.
“I think it is intolerable for democracy,” said George Edwards III, a political science professor at Texas A&M University and the author of a book on the Electoral College. “I can’t think of any justification for it and any justification that is offered doesn’t bear scrutiny.”
However, calls to change the system, which would require a constitutional amendment, are likely to fall on deaf ears with Republicans in control of both houses of US Congress.
Moreover, though there was some momentum for reform after Gore’s defeat, it dissipated after Bush and US president Barack Obama won both the popular and electoral votes in 2004, 2008 and 2012.
Some states have discussed a possibility that would not necessarily require amending the US Constitution: Jettisoning the winner-takes-all system, in which a single candidate is awarded all of a state’s electoral votes — regardless of the popular vote — and instead apportioning them to reflect the breakdown of each state’s popular vote. Two states, Maine and Nebraska, do this.
However, even that approach could face challenges, Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe said.
For reformers, the best hope might lie in the so-called National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement among US states to award all of their respective electoral votes to the candidate who wins the popular vote in a given election. Ten states and the District of Columbia have joined the agreement, but it will only go into effect when enough states have signed on to guarantee that the winner of the popular vote would win an election.
For now, it seems, any change still remains a far-off notion.
“I am very mad at James Madison,” former US Democratic representative Barney Frank said. “But I don’t think there’s anything I can do about it.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs