What progressives must learn
The saying “Democrats fall in love and Republicans fall in line” continues to be true.
We as a party cannot only nominate superstars to progress forward. When a transcendent figure like US President Barack Obama comes around, it is easy to fall in love and vote. However, not every nominee can be transcendent and it is our responsibility to continue to push for progress even if the nominee is flawed.
When we nominated Democratic candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, she was the only candidate in the general election that could have helped move the US forward. We failed her. We failed our values. We failed future generations. And we failed because we were selfish, thinking that if we were not completely in love, we would cast protest votes (third party, write-in, not vote) to provide ourselves with a “clean conscience.” However, it is because of our protest votes that US president-elect Donald Trump won. Numbers show progressives outnumbered conservatives in swing states (when comparing the number of votes and protest votes on each side). Even with Trump’s flaws, they still fell in line and voted for the most unqualified candidate ever, because they knew that to create change for a future they believe in, they needed to win.
We as progressives did not learn from 2000, but we must learn from this year. Winning is the only way to protect our values and create change. No matter how often we complain or protest, it will not matter, because they are in control.
We did not lose because we did not elect US Senator Bernie Sanders. Numbers show that Sanders had millions fewer votes than Clinton, and he did not get attacked and branded by the other side to affect his popularity. We also did not lose because we had a flawed candidate in Clinton. We have won with flawed candidates in the past. And their side continues to show us that no matter how flawed their candidate is, as long as they fall in line, even with the most flawed and unqualified candidate in history, they can still win.
We lost for a simple reason, we did not come together, but they did. Numbers show that more than 90 percent of conservatives in swing states voted for Trump. Numbers also show that if progressives did not cast as many protest votes compared with conservatives, Trump would not have won.
Therefore, I implore that we learn to keep our eyes on the ball. No matter who our candidate is in the future, no matter if you do not like him/her, vote for them. We vote not just for ourselves, but for our values, for our children, and what we believe the future should be. And only through winning can we affect change, and have a future where climate issues, women/minority rights and securing protection for those most in need can be protected.
Joshua Chengyung Fu
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.