Like other emerging economies in Asia, Taiwan saw great fluctuations in its financial markets in the three days following US president-elect Donald Trump’s surprise victory on Wednesday last week. Fortunately, Trump did not make inflammatory comments in his victory speech.
However, stunned by the election result, investors are still trying to glean information about what policies Trump plans to pursue after taking office on Jan. 20 and how that would affect their portfolios.
Experience indicates that “president Trump” might not actually follow the path laid out by “candidate Trump,” because he might face challenges winning the backing of US Congress for his policies, therefore investors do not need to worry too much about aggressive measures from the US president-elect.
However, Asia is likely to experience an initial shock in terms of investment and trade over the next few months, because of confusion and uncertainty about US policies, and delays in capital expenditures, while the real blow to the region’s economies might come next year amid higher US interest rates and a more hostile trade policy under Trump’s presidency.
Indeed, Trump’s victory symbolizes the end of the free-trade era of the past 40 years. Although he did not spend a lot of time talking about the details of his trade and economic policies throughout his campaign, his baseline hostility to free trade and repeated calls for higher tariffs on goods imported to the US have stoked fears of a more protectionist trade environment, posing risks for Asian economies, and China in particular, with regard to currency manipulation, loss of US jobs and the theft of intellectual property.
Many Taiwanese manufacturers that have built production bases in China to export goods to the US face greater uncertainty and they need to give serious consideration to the extent to which they could move their manufacturing facilities to the US to ward off trade disputes. They must also prepare for more punitive measures from the US in case anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and other trade investigations become more frequent under Trump’s presidency.
Another challenge facing Taiwan is Trump’s obvious distaste for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) deal. Trump never shied away from attacking free trade and globalization during his campaign, even threatening to void the TPP agreement after taking office. As a result, the White House’s acknowledgment on Friday that it is stopping the attempt to seek congressional approval for the TPP during President Barack Obama’s final months in office is not only a defeat for the Obama administration, but also a great disappointment for Taiwan, which has been trying to join the US-led TPP to help improve the nation’s overall position in regional economic integration, while decreasing its economic overdependence on China.
Despite the unpromising prospects for the TPP, Taiwan needs to move on and to continue seeking a broad-based advance in the major components of its economy, as the nation has reached a point where there is no time to waste to improve its economic structure and upgrade its industrial sector, with or without the trans-Pacific deal.
The world is not going to end for Taiwan if Trump seeks a US withdrawal from the TPP, but Taiwan needs to boost its trade ties with the US through the ongoing Trade and Investment Framework Agreement talks and has to consider that regionalism could be the dominant theme in Asia in the long term.
In view of the growth in intra-regional trade in Asia over the past few years, the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) should present clearer and bolder measures on its “new southbound policy.” Most importantly, concrete steps are needed, not just discussions about policy.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.