A crisis of public confidence in civic institutions — including governments, legislatures, courts, and the media — is a central factor in the rise of Republican US president-elect Donald Trump and figures such as him around the world. And so long as the crisis persists, such leaders will continue to resonate with voters, regardless of electoral outcomes.
The crisis is not new. A 2007 study, commissioned for a UN forum, showed a “pervasive” pattern: Over the past four decades, nearly all of the so-called developed, industrialized democracies have been experiencing a decrease in the public trust in government. In the 1990s, even countries long known for strong civic trust, such as Sweden and Norway, recorded a decline.
In the US, Gallup’s latest survey of “confidence in institutions” showed double-digit percentage declines in trust since the 1970s, or the earliest available measurement, for 12 of 17 institutions, including banks, US Congress, the presidency, schools, the press and churches. Of the remaining institutions, confidence increased modestly for four and significantly for just one: the US military.
As a social anthropologist who trained in Eastern Europe in the waning years of communism, I observed firsthand what happens to a society devoid of civic trust. People viewed formal institutions with profound skepticism and retreated into social silos: informal, close-knit (and closed) circles of friends, family and allies on which they relied for news, information and much else. Young people saw little reason to invest in their futures, and their elders succumbed to suicide and substance abuse at alarming rates.
There are similarities to some alarming trends in the US, Europe and elsewhere today. According to a major study by the economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton last year, the mortality rate for middle-aged, less-educated white men in the US has been surging in what some observers have called a wave of “despair deaths.”
At the same time, millennials — those born between 1982 and 2004 — are postponing marriage and home or car purchases, with many telling pollsters that the postponement will be permanent.
They are residing with their parents at rates not seen since 1940 and many are eking out a living through a patchwork of “gigs” that provide neither benefits nor job security.
As a result, a growing cohort of people are identifying as outsiders. Doors that were once open to them have been shut and their faith in public institutions to represent their interests has significantly eroded. Many look to anti-establishment movements and figures, such as Trump, for salvation.
This same tendency is apparent in the anti-elite, anti-system rage that has erupted across Europe, reflected in the UK’s Brexit referendum; the Alternative for Germany Party’s continued rise; National Front leader Marine Le Pen’s strong showing in the French presidential campaign and the Austrian elections this year, where for the first time since World War II no “establishment” candidates made it to the final ballot.
In the US, as the presidential campaign got under way, many voters clearly believed — not without reason — that the system was “rigged.” However, democracy and distrust can be a dangerous compound, because people confronting complex political and economic issues do not always direct their anger at the proper target.
Profound economic and technological changes in recent decades — together with privatization, deregulation, digitization and financialization — have further empowered elites and enabled them to hone their use of political influencing via think tanks and philanthropies; shadow lobbying, workarounds that subvert standard processes; the media; campaign finance; and stints in “public service” to advance their interests. This “new corruption,” though usually technically legal, is virtually nontransparent — and thus highly corrosive of public trust.
This, along with widening income inequality, helps explain how voters can be swayed by a candidate such as Trump, especially when they live, as many increasingly do, in their own information universes. Facebook and Twitter algorithms confirm a group’s biases and screen out contrary viewpoints — and even facts. The digital age has created an insularity that, ironically, is not unlike that fostered under communism.
The result is frighteningly familiar to anyone who has studied Eastern European history. Like Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump harnesses futility and anger, exploits nostalgic yearning and nationalism, and finds convenient scapegoats in vulnerable people such as immigrants. As in Russia, where gays and other minorities have been officially targeted, disenchanted people in the US are being encouraged to harass and demonize already marginalized groups.
Trust is the lifeblood of a thriving society, and much of the West needs an emergency transfusion. However, its political systems will remain on life support until the entrenched elites feel sufficiently vulnerable to stop ignoring the needs of those who have been left behind.
Janine R. Wedel is an anthropologist and professor at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs