Early this month, the convener of the legislature’s Social Welfare and Environmental Hygiene Committee, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Ying (陳瑩), passed the “one fixed day off and one flexible rest day” draft amendment to the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法), which would also cut the number of public holidays to seven.
This move was not well received by labor organizations, who recently gathered 3,000 people in a protest outside the DPP’s headquarters and the Legislative Yuan, which they pelted with eggs. Coincidentally, more than 50 youth organizations had also protested at the party headquarters several days earlier, when they criticized the DPP for having turned into a pro-capitalist party and said that nothing the government could offer in exchange for the seven days would be acceptable.
These demands for holidays based on the view that they are part of the basic human right to live in health is fully in line with 21st century mainstream thought on basic labor rights.
As early as 1948, Article 24 of the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights stated: “Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.”
Furthermore, Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which was incorporated into Taiwanese law in 2009, also states unambiguously that “the states parties to the present covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of just and favorable conditions of work, which ensure, in particular: remuneration which provides all workers, as a minimum, with ... rest, leisure and reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay, as well as remuneration for public holidays.”
However, data published by the Ministry of Labor recently showed that Taiwan ranked fifth in the world in terms of average annual working hours, at 2,014 hours per year. The only countries with a higher average were Singapore, Mexico, Costa Rica and South Korea. This makes it clear that Taiwanese are overworked and that rights to rest, leisure and holidays are not protected as stipulated by the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
According to Taiwan’s current system, civil servants have two fixed days off per week, while 40 percent of all workers would only have one fixed day off and one rest day per week if the amendment is passed. This is different from two fixed days off per week, because the legal definition of fixed days off and rest days is different.
With exceptions for natural disasters, emergencies or other such events, employers cannot order someone to work on a fixed day off. If an employee agrees to work overtime, the employer must double their salary for the extra time worked and provide a day of compensatory leave. However, for rest days employers can ask employees to work overtime, without exceptions for disasters and the like. In addition, they only have to pay a certain portion on top of the base salary as overtime and they do not have to provide a day of compensatory leave.
The Civil Service Act (公務員服務法) clearly stipulates two fixed days off every week, although agencies with special operational requirements are allowed to use rolling work schedules or other solutions.
In other words, civil servants can still get their fixed days off through such special measures.
This system with two fixed days off every week is very different from the system used for workers, who will only have one fixed day and one rest day each week. It means that workers will not get a true five-day workweek. The current solution is just a “pragmatic way” for the ministry to allow employers room to manipulate holidays while still being able to claim they are implementing a five-day workweek. This is why labor and youth organizations are unhappy, as they think that this is a serious blow to an equal holiday system and their right to a healthy life.
The preamble of the Swiss Federal Constitution, which took effect on Jan. 1, 2000, states that “the strength of a people is measured by the wellbeing of its weakest members.”
A look at the weakest members of Taiwanese society, and in particular the salaries and benefits of young workers, shows everything that needs to be known about Taiwan’s national strength.
If we could take all the excessive, unjust remuneration of the chairmen, general managers and independent directors of government-run banks, corporations and listed companies and use positive legislation to convert it into reasonable compensation to support the public’s rights to holidays and health, that would put an end to the current image of financial immorality and exploitation, and it would also promote social harmony and unity.
Lin Terng-yaw is a retired professor of law who taught at Tunghai University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.