Early this month, the convener of the legislature’s Social Welfare and Environmental Hygiene Committee, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Ying (陳瑩), passed the “one fixed day off and one flexible rest day” draft amendment to the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法), which would also cut the number of public holidays to seven.
This move was not well received by labor organizations, who recently gathered 3,000 people in a protest outside the DPP’s headquarters and the Legislative Yuan, which they pelted with eggs. Coincidentally, more than 50 youth organizations had also protested at the party headquarters several days earlier, when they criticized the DPP for having turned into a pro-capitalist party and said that nothing the government could offer in exchange for the seven days would be acceptable.
These demands for holidays based on the view that they are part of the basic human right to live in health is fully in line with 21st century mainstream thought on basic labor rights.
As early as 1948, Article 24 of the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights stated: “Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.”
Furthermore, Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which was incorporated into Taiwanese law in 2009, also states unambiguously that “the states parties to the present covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of just and favorable conditions of work, which ensure, in particular: remuneration which provides all workers, as a minimum, with ... rest, leisure and reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay, as well as remuneration for public holidays.”
However, data published by the Ministry of Labor recently showed that Taiwan ranked fifth in the world in terms of average annual working hours, at 2,014 hours per year. The only countries with a higher average were Singapore, Mexico, Costa Rica and South Korea. This makes it clear that Taiwanese are overworked and that rights to rest, leisure and holidays are not protected as stipulated by the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
According to Taiwan’s current system, civil servants have two fixed days off per week, while 40 percent of all workers would only have one fixed day off and one rest day per week if the amendment is passed. This is different from two fixed days off per week, because the legal definition of fixed days off and rest days is different.
With exceptions for natural disasters, emergencies or other such events, employers cannot order someone to work on a fixed day off. If an employee agrees to work overtime, the employer must double their salary for the extra time worked and provide a day of compensatory leave. However, for rest days employers can ask employees to work overtime, without exceptions for disasters and the like. In addition, they only have to pay a certain portion on top of the base salary as overtime and they do not have to provide a day of compensatory leave.
The Civil Service Act (公務員服務法) clearly stipulates two fixed days off every week, although agencies with special operational requirements are allowed to use rolling work schedules or other solutions.
In other words, civil servants can still get their fixed days off through such special measures.
This system with two fixed days off every week is very different from the system used for workers, who will only have one fixed day and one rest day each week. It means that workers will not get a true five-day workweek. The current solution is just a “pragmatic way” for the ministry to allow employers room to manipulate holidays while still being able to claim they are implementing a five-day workweek. This is why labor and youth organizations are unhappy, as they think that this is a serious blow to an equal holiday system and their right to a healthy life.
The preamble of the Swiss Federal Constitution, which took effect on Jan. 1, 2000, states that “the strength of a people is measured by the wellbeing of its weakest members.”
A look at the weakest members of Taiwanese society, and in particular the salaries and benefits of young workers, shows everything that needs to be known about Taiwan’s national strength.
If we could take all the excessive, unjust remuneration of the chairmen, general managers and independent directors of government-run banks, corporations and listed companies and use positive legislation to convert it into reasonable compensation to support the public’s rights to holidays and health, that would put an end to the current image of financial immorality and exploitation, and it would also promote social harmony and unity.
Lin Terng-yaw is a retired professor of law who taught at Tunghai University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under