The Japanese Constitution promises gender equality and the Japanese prime minister says he wants a society where all women can “shine.” However, many women say it is hard to do that when they cannot even use their own surnames.
Under a Japanese law that dates to the Meiji era, more than a century ago, all married couples must use one surname. In theory, a couple may choose either the husband’s or the wife’s last name, but in practice, 96 percent of women assume their husband’s.
Recent court rulings indicate that the law is unlikely to be softened anytime soon, despite rising criticism.
Yoko Uozumi is happily married with a four-year-old daughter. Two months ago, she took a job in the photograph framing business where her husband also works and decided to use only the surname that she was given at birth.
Uozumi, 36, said she did not want customers to confuse her with her husband, Shigeru Otsuka, as most employees are known primarily by their last names in Japan.
Using her birth surname went beyond convenience. It was also a declaration of empowerment.
“I feel more independent,” Uozumi said. “I feel more who I am.”
However, the choice she made is not available to all Japanese women. This month, a Tokyo District Court declined to grant a high school teacher’s request to use her birth name at work.
That decision came after the Japanese Supreme Court ruled in December last year that the law did not violate the Constitution or place an undue burden on women, because an increasing number of employers permit women to use their birth surnames professionally.
Critics were disappointed by the Supreme Court decision, because it did not strike down the legal prohibition against separate surnames for married couples, leaving it to the parliament instead.
Among democratic countries in the developed world, Japan ranks low on gender equality in health, education, the economy and politics. Despite recent high-profile examples, women hold very few powerful positions in politics or business, while many working mothers complain that day care is inadequate.
The marital naming law, supported by many conservatives who believe that women belong predominantly in the home supporting their husbands and families, is seen by some as another vestige of discrimination against women in Japanese society.
In the Tokyo District Court case, the three judges, all men, ruled that the teacher’s employer, a private school in Tokyo, could not be compelled to let her use her birth surname at work. Citing surveys that show about a quarter of women use their birth surnames in the workplace, the court said doing so was “not deeply rooted in society.”
The plaintiff, who has remained anonymous in the publicly available court documents, declined an interview request through her lawyer. In court filings, the teacher, described as recently married, said students and colleagues knew her by her given surname. She asked to be allowed to continue to use it on letters home to parents, attendance records and report cards.
Makiko Terahara, one of the lawyers for the plaintiff, said the teacher, now in her 30s, had worked for 15 years using her birth surname.
“We have to work on changing the law so that couples can choose their names when marrying,” Terahara said. “A name represents a person. It’s a matter of personal rights.”
Hidehisa Takase, the principal of Nihon University Daisangakuen, the school where the plaintiff works, said he had offered a compromise in which the teacher could continue to be called by her birth name publicly, but use her married name for official documents, including student report cards.
“We don’t think we denied her individual identity,” Takase said in an interview.
In court documents, the school argued that the teacher’s married name was “the best way to identify an individual.”
“The desire of the plaintiff to use her commonly known name, which is different from her legal name, is not legally protected,” the school said.
Critics also said the law trails the private sector, which has been accommodating more women who prefer to use their birth surnames professionally. According to a 2013 survey of large firms by the Institute of Labor Administration, a think tank in Tokyo, about two-thirds of the respondents allowed women to use their given names at work, up from less than 20 percent in 1995.
In the US, where women may legally keep their surnames after marriage, there is still a strong social convention among heterosexual couples for wives to take their husbands’ names. Even the highest estimates show only one in five US women keeps her surname when she marries.
“Naming is really one of the last socially approved kinds of sexist behavior,” Laurie Scheuble, a sociologist at Pennsylvania State University, wrote in an e-mail.
In Japan, advocates for women, including lawmakers across the political spectrum, say they simply want women to make their own choices about their names.
“I don’t want to make a law where every couple has to use two different names,” said Kimie Iwata, president of the Japan Institute for Women’s Empowerment and Diversity Management. “But I want the society to make a law that is generous to everyone and accepts diversity.”
While campaigning recently for the leadership of the opposition Japanese Democratic Party, Renho Murata said she wanted to help change the marital naming law. (She goes simply by the name Renho, and her Twitter handle is @Renho_sha, using her birth surname.)
Seiko Noda, a member of the House of Representatives from the governing Liberal Democratic Party, said she had advocated the right to separate surnames for a quarter of a century.
“We lawmakers have to destroy this wrong practice,” Noda said, lamenting that many of her fellow Japanese Liberal Democrats did not care about overturning the law.
Noda’s husband, formerly Fuminobu Kimura, took her last name.
“Whenever he has bad luck, he always complains, ‘Oh, it’s because my surname changed,’” Noda said.
She said he now supports an overhaul of the marital naming law.
“He understands how much [of a] burden women have to go through,” she said.
Public opinion polls show a significant shift in views on married couples using a single surname. In 1976, close to two-thirds surveyed by the Japanese Ministry of Justice said the law was fine as is; that had dropped to just over one-third in 2012.
In the absence of legal reform, some couples choose not to legally register their marriages, even though women in such relationships have fewer legal protections.
Mizuho Fukushima, 60, a member of the upper house of parliament from the Japanese Social Democratic Party who has repeatedly proposed a revision of the single-surname law, said she had remained in a common-law marriage for about four decades with Yuichi Kaido, a lawyer with whom she has a daughter.
“When I met him, I was Mizuho Fukushima, and my identity is Mizuho Fukushima,” she said.
A younger generation of working women say their birth surnames carry professional clout that they do not want to lose when they marry.
“My name is my brand,” said Miyuki Inoue, 28, who works in sales at a human resources consulting firm.
She married three years ago, but continues to use her given surname at the office.
“I don’t want to waste the trust and good reputation that I’ve built in my career,” she said.
Additional reporting by Makiko Inoue and Hisako Ueno
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under