Following the freezing of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) assets, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) accused the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government of trying to kill his party and labeled the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee a “fascist organization.”
This kind of language belongs to the victims of the KMT’s White Terror during the Martial Law era. That it should be adopted today by one of its perpetrators is both ridiculous and laughable, but also very sad.
There are many White Terror victims, but the perpetrators have yet to be confronted. Many of today’s democratically elected politicians are worried that if they speak out, they would be portrayed as trying to exact revenge for past grievances — so that in many cases they dare not even blame the perpetrators.
Without assigning blame, perpetrators are not only incognizant of their guilt, but they also think allowances have been made for their actions. As a result, no sooner the KMT got its hands on political power again, it resorted to its old, oppressive ways.
Ma used state power to persecute former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), and former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) of the KMT continued the poisonous legacy of his party by persecuting former Taipei Municipal Zhongshan Junior High School music teacher Hsiao Hsiao-ling (蕭曉玲).
Although the perpetrators have lost their power, they have yet to acknowledge their wrongdoings, but instead, like scorpions, they continue to spread poison throughout society. They invent countercharges against those attempting to obtain justice, they subvert the truth, and swear that black is white and white is black.
The Ma regime was the result of Taiwan’s failure to bring perpetrators of past injustices to account. Without transitional justice and a proper inquiry, the perpetrators believe that they are innocent, while victims believe the scales of justice are weighted unfairly against them.
Since the DPP regained power in May, the perpetrators within the KMT have continued to deny all culpability and launched a series of verbal attacks on the victims of their crimes.
During Taiwan’s authoritarian past, Ma was a participant in his party’s autocratic government. He added the following sentence to Article 9 of the National Security Act (國安法): “Decided criminal cases shall not be subject to appeal or resistant announcement.”
This provides a legal basis to reject any attempts to reverse verdicts for Martial Law era cases by barring appeals and counter-appeals. The motive was to cover up the perpetrators’ crimes and wipe the slate clean of their past wrongdoings. It was a move by the perpetrators who were concerned that they would be held accountable for their actions.
Germany places no time limits on the pursuit of justice for crimes perpetrated by Nazis. This is not just to punish the now-elderly perpetrators; it is also to provide a standard from which society can judge the difference between right and wrong. Accomplices to Nazi crimes were clearly in the wrong and wherever they hide — even in the most remote corner of the world — they will be held to account.
Taiwan has not pursued the perpetrators of historic injustices. The DPP must stand up and be counted. It must revise the law so that, in addition to resolving the KMT’s ill-gotten assets issue, perpetrators of White Terror era crimes are forced to confess, recognize the innocence of those that they harmed and issue a public apology.
This would help guard against the perpetrators from getting their hands on power again and issuing nefarious statements to the public.
Liou Uie-liang is a former president of the Taiwan Association in Germany.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with