Sad, but not without hope
Remembering the letters of Ralph Jensen, Daniel Parent and Oliver Drewett (Letters, Oct. 17, page 6; Oct. 19, page 8; Oct. 22, page 8), I am forced to add my impressions about living in Taiwan.
Four years ago, I came with my Taiwanese wife back to Taiwan for retirement after almost 40 years in Germany.
I applied for a residence permit and my wife for a Republic of China passport.
After four weeks we got both; I got my permit and had to pay NT$3,000 for three years. My wife got her passport plus her National Health Insurance card.
When I asked where my health insurance card was, I got the answer: You have to wait six months.
So I tried to get private insurance, but no one wanted to insure me, because I did not have the basic insurance. Seven months without health insurance. Thank you.
Before we left Germany we both applied for a new European driving license plus International Driving Permit.
When we went to apply for a local driver’s license, my wife got it at once; I had to take a driving test. Wrong passport.
Last year we turned 65 years old. As an owner of an EasyCard I got a new one with some discount. My wife got one with more discount. Correct passport.
When we traveled to places like Tainan or Alishan, we were told that as we are seniors, many places would give us discount, but only with the right passport.
Also, after 65, my wife does not have to pay for National Health Insurance. I still have to pay. Thank you.
When my wife came to Germany about 40 years ago, she was immediately insured by a private insurance firm. After we married, she became a member of the family insurance.
In my country, every senior receives some discount if it is offered, no matter what passport they carry.
After our wedding, my wife got an unlimited visa. I have to pay NT$1,000 for each year here and have to say “thank you.”
We have many friends and family in Taiwan and we experienced great hospitality when we immigrated, but for a nation that wants to become a member of the UN and be a global player, it has to clean up the mess in its own neighborhood first.
Discrimination and racism should be unknown in such a wonderful nation and nice people.
I hope and pray that after eight years of corruption, bribery and vote-buying, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) will do a great job.
Norbert Sladek
Taoyuan
Taiwanese imagining Taiwan
Jerome Keating (“Taiwan needs a new ‘consensus,’” Oct. 23, page 6) argues that Taiwan needs a “new consensus” to replace the (so-called, as the Taipei Times always puts it) “1992 consensus,” and that this new consensus would be forged with Japan as an ally.
Nothing wrong with having Japan as an ally, no doubt that would be a beneficial confab.
And the “1992 consensus,” whether so-called or actual, seems a bit of a fairy tale, with the idea of different interpretations of what exactly one nation comprises of, exhibiting an ignorance of what real nations are and encompass.
They are not subject to “interpretation,” they just are — unified national entities with their own histories, identities, constitutions, ethics, morals, cultures and the like. They are not two interpretations or readings at one and the same time.
In any case, rather than Keating’s proposal, which sounds more like a straightforward administrative alliance than a new compromised understanding and elucidation, I would suggest that Taiwan come up with a new “consensus,” but that that consensus stem from Taiwanese — no other nations, entities or coalitions involved.
In other words, Taiwanese could forge their own national consensus, based on their own views of nationhood, character, the past and their own chronicle, public events, their particular heroes, political will, civic engagement and identity.
The extent to which this identity identifies with China might be a sticking point, and may require what I am suggesting to be rethought and retooled.
However, there might be nothing wrong with that and in the end maybe Taiwan and China will “unify” into a joint venture of sorts, with a combined view on all the qualities I have mentioned. It could be interesting and would indeed be a new consensus, possibly a very cooperative and advantageous one.
Whichever way Taiwanese go, in the end I hope that the consensus and the accord they fashion is indeed their own, their personal will and determination expressed onto an international (transnational, better) stage in an obliging, empathetic venture.
You go Taiwan, speak up and let us all know your own “interpretation” of the world in which you function.
David Russell Pendery
Taipei
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China