APRC frustrations
In response to Ralph Jensen’s letter, they know all this, they are smart, but they still do not/cannot do it (Letter, Oct. 17, page 8). The million-dollar question is: Why not? Fear? Taiwanese say “afraid to let go,” or “cannot get something for nothing. The next question is: Why afraid? History? A small island?
It is pretty simple, it is called “family sponsorship.” If one member of a family gets an alien permanent resident certificate (APRC), then they should have the right to sponsor the rest of the family. There is such a process in place in Canada, where I come from.
No need to be a rocket scientist to understand that a family is a single unit and therefore you cannot simply give an APRC to one family member and not the rest of the family. How is a family supposed to make long-term plans?
Under such circumstances, it is impossible for a family to put down roots, lay down a foundation and live a normal, secure life. All Taiwanese who have emigrated are well aware of this.
They are great on the front-end: “Come, come, come, Taiwan is a great place,” but seriously lacking on the back-end with the follow-through. They have a hard time walking the walk. It reminds me of first-generation family-owned businesses in Taiwan. Some are making the transition, changing and adapting with the help of second-generation children, but some are not so lucky, unfortunately.
So beautiful Taiwan, not only are you losing the first generation, but there does not appear to be much hope for the second generation either. Not a very promising future. Those with APRCs have all gone through your rigorous vetting processes, so “what is the problem with our spouses and children?”
Keep trying to attract talent, keep losing talent, keep breaking up families, keep destroying dreams, but also please try to remember the definition of insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Please remember all the people, the families that retreated to Taiwan with Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) thinking that it was only for a while. You of all people should know how it feels to be separated from family, to have your dreams shattered to pieces.
I remember a Taiwanese businessman telling me once: “Daniel, we have seen rich nations rise and fall in Asia, we sure do not want to follow in their footsteps, but if we are not careful then that might just happen to us too.”
The writing is on the wall, Taiwan, it is up to you to do something about it before it is too late. Get to the root cause of the problem and no more superficial quick-fix approaches. The window of opportunity is closing. What else do we need to do to prove our loyalty to you.
Please put your money where your mouth is (ie, “If you really love us then prove it”). Let us rise up to the occasion together, we are on the same side.
Daniel Parent
Kaohsiung
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations